Laserfiche WebLink
I I <br /> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> Walgreen Company retained Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. (Bureau Veritas)to conduct a <br /> Limited Subsurface Investigation (LSI) at Walgreen Store#02680 located at 15 West Harding Way <br /> in Stockton, California (referred to as the"subject property"). <br /> This LSI scope of work was developed based on a review of the Phase I Environmental Site <br /> Assessment(ESA)that was conducted at the subject property by Bureau Veritas(Project Number <br /> 99008-008321, dated September 5, 2008). This LSI was performed in accordance with Bureau <br /> Veritas Proposal number 0711.08.0806, dated October 23, 2008. The purpose of the LSI scope <br /> of work was to evaluate the recognized environmental conditions(RECs)that were identified in <br /> the Phase I ESA: <br /> • Historic On-Site Filling/Service Station (3'/z W. Harding Way/ 1501 North Center <br /> Street) <br /> • Southwestern and Upgradient Adjoining Dry Cleaners (48 West Harding Way) <br /> • Southeast Adjoining Filling Station (16 West Harding Way) <br /> • Historic Nearby Properties <br /> The following conclusions were based on the observations and data obtained on November 11, 20 <br /> and 24, 2008 during Bureau Veritas' LSI of the subject property: <br /> • The geophysical survey performed by NORCAL did not identify suspect features and/or <br /> buried metallic anomalies that are indicative of filling/service station equipment or USTs in <br /> the areas investigated. <br /> • No physical evidence of soil contamination was noted in the soil borings during this LSI <br /> with the exception of deep(approx. 30 feet bgs)elevated PID readings in BV-2, with <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon odors in BV-3 and BV-4 that appear to be representative of <br /> subsurface groundwater conditions and capillary fringe soils. Concentrations of VOCs <br /> and TPH were not detected in the analyzed soil samples. No further action or <br /> investigation of soil at the subject property appears warranted at this time. <br /> • Detected concentrations of TPH-g in grab-groundwater samples do not appear to be <br /> significant. Gasoline range TPH compounds were only reported in grab-groundwater <br /> samples collected along the south subject property boundary. Elevated concentrations of <br /> TPH-d and TPH-mo range compounds appear to indicate one or more sources, especially <br /> since the most significant TPH-d concentrations in groundwater had patterns for Stoddard <br /> solvent and kerosene. Stoddard solvent and kerosene were commonly used as cleaning <br /> or degreasing compounds at automotive repair and other industrial facilities in the past. <br /> Stoddard solvent was also commonly used as a dry cleaning solvent in the past. TPH-mo <br /> concentrations in grab-groundwater samples were detected at somewhat higher <br /> concentrations than the TPH-d concentrations in the same analyzed sample. TPH in <br /> grab-groundwater samples was found to be elevated in the vicinity of the former on-site <br /> filling/service station but not in the upgradient sample BV-5. The low concentrations of <br /> TPH-g along with TPH-d results with non-standard patterns reported by the laboratory <br /> likely indicate aged releases from one or more sources that could have originated from on <br /> site and or off site. <br /> • Additional site characterization may be requested by SJCEHD to determine the source(s) <br /> of the TPH concentrations found in groundwater at the subject property and to confirm the <br /> reported concentrations. <br /> • The groundwater beneath the subject property is impacted with PCE and other <br /> degradation breakdown VOCs that appear to be associated with the upgradient dry <br /> cleaner facility located to the southwest. The highest concentrations of PCE in <br /> i Project Number 99007-000526.03 <br />