Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE 2 amed--* <br /> GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULT S - LATHROP FACILITY <br /> Sample TPH-Diese12 Total Cr3 Dissolved Cr Dissolved Cr VI4 <br /> Well ID Sample ID Date Method 8015M Method 6010 Method 6010 Method 7199 <br /> CDPH MCLS __6 50 50 50 <br /> RWQCB WQG 100 5n 50 50 <br /> LPW-3 LP-D-012610 01/26/10 <50 <10 <10 2.8 <br /> (cont'd) LPW-3 02/17/10 <50 <10 <10 7.1 <br /> LP-D-021710 02/17/10 <50 <10 <10 6.8 <br /> Reporting Limit 50 10 10 0.5 <br /> Method Detection Limit -- 3 3 0.2 <br /> Notes: <br /> 1. Listed data before June 2005 are from the URS Semiannual Groundwater Report(November and December 2004). <br /> Bold values indicate concentrations exceed screening criteria. <br /> 2. TPH-diesel=diesel range total petroleum hydrocarbons. <br /> 3. Total Cr=total chromium. <br /> 4. Cr VI =hexavalent chromium (or Chromium VI). <br /> 5. CDPH MCL= California Department of Public Health Maximum Contaminant Level for Cr in drinking water. <br /> 6. "--"= not applicable. <br /> 7. RWQCB WQG = Regional Water Quality Control Board-Central Valley Region, Water Quality Goal <br /> 8. "<"= not detected at or above the reporting limit(RL) or method detection limit(MDL). <br /> 9. J =estimated concentration between the RL and MDL. <br /> 10. W=weathered diesel or other petroleum hydrocarbons with higher boiling points. <br /> 11. J1 =estimated value; sample was analyzed outside the holding time for Cr VI by the laboratory. <br /> 12. Analysis conducted by Agriculture and Priority Pollutants Laboratories, Inc., in Clovis, California. <br /> 13. J2=estimated value;the percent recovery of the matrix spike (MS) and matrix spike duplicate (MSD) <br /> are above the laboratory control limits; therefore,the sample results are estimated and potentially biased high. <br /> 14. J4=estimated value; the percent recovery of the MS and MSD are below the laboratory control limits; <br /> therefore, the sample results are estimated and potentially biased low. <br /> 15. G= sample was reported by URS to be cloudy and the initial analytical result for total Cr was 120 micrograms <br /> per liter(Ng/L). Due to turbidity, the sample was centrifuged and filtered through 47 millimeter(mm) glass fiber filter reanalysis <br /> prior to digestion and reanalysis. Total Cr concentration after was reported at 13 pg/L. <br /> 16. G1 =sample was reported by URS to be highly turbid and the initial reported analytical result for Total Cr was 770 pg/L. <br /> Due to turbidity, the sample was centrifuged and filtered through 47 mm glass fiber filter prior to digestion and <br /> reanalysis. Total Cr concentration after reanalysis was reported at 8 J pg/L. <br /> 17. J3=estimated concentration due to the absolute difference between the primary and duplicate results, <br /> which exceeds the RL(relative percent difference not calculated because the result for the primary sample <br /> is less than 5 times the RL). <br /> AMEC Geomatrix, Inc. <br /> P:\10626.000.0\Docs\Semi-Annua1 Groundwater Monitoring&Sampling\Lathrop Monthly Groundwater Monitoring\Tables\Tab1e_2.xls Page 3 of 3 <br />