Laserfiche WebLink
ameO <br /> WQG (100 fag/L) in the groundwater samples collected at this Facility. For the most part, <br /> historical detections of petroleum hydrocarbons in the groundwater samples were classified by <br /> the laboratory as weathered diesel or higher boiling point petroleum hydrocarbons. <br /> Furthermore, TPH-diesel has been mainly reported in groundwater samples from the well <br /> (LPW-1) located cross-gradient to the former stockpile (adjacent to the eastern boundary of <br /> the Facility), twice in the groundwater samples from the upgradient well (LPW-3), and only <br /> once in the groundwater samples from the downgradient well (LPW-2). <br /> Total Cr was detected in the groundwater samples from monitoring wells LPW-1, LPW-2, and <br /> LPW-3 at concentrations of 31 pg/L, 29 pg/L, and 3.2J pg/L ("J" is estimated) (LPW-3 <br /> duplicate at 3.OJ), respectively. Dissolved Cr was detected in the groundwater samples from <br /> wells LPW-1 and LPW-2 at concentrations of 20 pg/L and 12 pg/L, respectively. Dissolved Cr <br /> was not detected above the laboratory reporting limit (10 pg/L) in the groundwater samples <br /> from well LPW-3. The reported concentrations of total and dissolved Cr were below the CDPH <br /> MCL of 50 pg/L and within the range of concentrations detected during previous groundwater <br /> monitoring events. <br /> Dissolved Cr VI was detected in the groundwater samples from monitoring wells LPW-1 <br /> (cross-gradient), LPW-2 (downgradient), and LPW-3 (upgradient) at concentrations of <br /> 19 pg/L, 12 pg/L, and 5.6 Ng/L (LPW-3 duplicate at 4.9 pg/L), respectively. The reported <br /> concentrations of dissolved Cr VI in the groundwater samples were below the CDPH MCL of <br /> 50 pg/L and within the range of concentrations detected during previous groundwater <br /> monitoring events. <br /> Since the removal of the stockpile in October 2007, almost three years of groundwater <br /> monitoring has been conducted at the Lathrop facility (nine groundwater sampling events), and <br /> groundwater sample concentrations at wells LPW-1, LPW-2, and LPW-3 appear to be stable <br /> or decreasing (Figures 6 through 11). <br /> 4.2.2 French Camp Facility <br /> During the August 2010 sampling event, TPH-diesel was not detected above the laboratory <br /> reporting limit of 50 pg/L in the groundwater samples from the three monitoring wells (FCW-1, <br /> FCW-2, and FCW-3). At this Facility, TPH-diesel has only been detected above the WQG of <br /> 100 pg/L in the groundwater samples from well FCW-1 (cross-gradient well) between May <br /> 2004 and May 2007, in May 2008, and in May 2009. As reported during historical sampling <br /> events, the laboratory classified the petroleum hydrocarbons as higher boiling point <br /> hydrocarbons. Consistent with previous monitoring events, TPH-diesel was not detected <br /> above the laboratory reporting limit of 50 pg/L in groundwater samples from well FCW-2 <br /> (cross-to downgradient well) and well FCW-3 (upgradient well). <br /> AMSC Geomatrix, Inc. <br /> P:\10626.000.0\Docs\Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring&Sampling\Semi-Annual 1-10 8 <br />