My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HUNTER
>
819
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522087
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2020 5:22:22 PM
Creation date
2/24/2020 2:33:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0522087
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0015049
FACILITY_NAME
UNIFIRST CORP
STREET_NUMBER
819
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
HUNTER
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
819 N HUNTER
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 2 <br /> r <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: William Pipes [WPipes@geomatrix.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 3:24 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: UniFirst Facility, Stockton <br /> Attachments: 13290-04.doc; unifirst schedule <br /> Mike - here is a summary of what we did/are doing: <br /> 1. we collected off-site gw samples in July 2007 -we had permits from you and Reid for those <br /> 2. we were then supposed to install mw's based on those results -we also had permits from you and Reid for <br /> those <br /> 3. we did not install the wells - becasue we did not define the limits of the plume during this phase os sampling <br /> 4. we revised the scope of the groundwater investigation -see attachment -we added more gw sampling <br /> locations and added on-site soil vapor sampling -we will put in the wells we were supposed to put in the first time <br /> based on these second set of data <br /> 5. the RWQCB approved the revisions to the investigation - see attached email from Amy Terrell <br /> 6. So....come 10/22.....we hope to 1) collect more gw samples 2) install wells and 3) do a SV survey....of course, <br /> god willing and we have the correct permits...... <br /> Hope that helps bring you up to speed. <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 3:12 PM <br /> To: William Pipes <br /> Subject: RE: UniFirst Facility, Stockton <br /> if nothing has changed since the last phase, no. <br /> I'm just so far behind on this site I can't remember what was approved or changed since we were out there <br /> punching holes months ago, <br /> if the wells were approved long ago, then I'm ok with it. but if they have been added (proposed)since our last field <br /> mobe, then YES, get me the CVRWQCB's ok letter. <br /> From: William Pipes [mailto:WPipes@geomatrix.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 3:07 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: UniFirst Facility, Stockton <br /> I'll check with Alex..... <br /> re the RWQCB - I can send you their approvals -would you like them? <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 2:52 PM <br /> 9/28/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.