SU0013058 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

c 6 CtiAVTER 2 TPS DFI 4 PLAR J i El 7n. the case of all other actions those that do not meet as coveted actions (Wager Code sections $5001 (c) and ( 85022). The Council, has takea a hybrid approach to devei the criteria of being a coveted action of are othetwise opingtheDeltaPla-ibyincludingbothtegulatorypolicies eaplichly chided), t~oeDelta J?lan's polis es, where and nontegalatory recom-tamdations. This section. presents a applicable, ate xecomtnendations. discussion of the process and gencral. regtvremcuts for ccit't- What 1s n Cowered Action? Eying r..onsistencywith the Delta. PIan tbroagh complance - with. its regulatory policies, andincludes exatnples of covered For a State or local agency to det�nine whether its 1.'rO' posed plans, programs, or projects arc coveredactioias under actions and exetcptions. rile Delta Plan and, therefore, sub jest to the t egulator y provi Delta PIaa regulatory policies are notiateuded and shall not cions i i the ptan;it must statt with the Delta Reform. Act; ba construed as airtbori7ing the Council of any entity acting Which defines a coveted action as (Water Code section pu , ,ant. to this section to exercise their Powe` in a manner 85057.5 (i;,))* +3iatwill tad,-e or damage private proper for public use a ,Iiti�robt, oriro�ecta r dined fur ruantto vrithout the paymc= of just compensaflon. These policies Seciiart 2901] f the Public l3emurxes Godo tbatmeets ate not intended to affect the rights of any ower ofpropettg all eftbe follolvirg cortdltio under the-Constitution of the stzte of California or the United Stctes. None of the Delia. Plan policies increases the 9. Dill ocwtsr, in Jvbole ar n j�art, r Fbin t}�e State's floodliab7ity, haundar*s "j e Ddta or Rim Marsh; 2. 1V4q be carried on; approyerl, m funded by the Covered Actions Must COMPIV Ade ora local pubk agency; Aril h Delta Plan Policies The Delta Reforn Act:t:eg=J es State and local actions that 3. Is cniwed by orae or more providam eche fit the legal definition of a covered action to be consistent Dem Pla9h with the policies included ton. the Delta Plan. The mechanism 4, T/ill bane a figsufriajrt int act wt tLa acbietx tient for detertaining consistency-is the filing ofa certification of ogre or both of the coepyalgaah orfhe consistency. Not all. actions ihaptoccuriswhole oxin. pat-tin7m staiianofgottarnrnestt4ansoreclflood the Deli are covered actons Only certain activities gvzli£y cotrtro; prograru Sri re �:ce tirkr topevGle, r as covered actions, and the Delta Reform Act establishes yyq erg, wid ,hate interests in the Deltaq specific criteria and exclusions, discussed in this chaptet. - _— Putthertnore. 1gpte 2-3 shows the steps to follow for identifying whethet a proposcd plan, ptoject; or plogratn is a coveted action.. ID 'Bic State orlo<-�lagencythatcat�ies Quit; approves, or funds a proposed action de~termitnes whether that Scroann ng Wtada for Covered Aef'iaw proposedplan, prog'am, or project is a covered action (subjectto judicial :review of whether the detetxt�i;zation used in this Delta Plan, the statrlioty cdteria for covered was reasonable gnd cousistmtwirh-thelaw), actions under theDelta. Plan ate collectivelpzeFerxedto as 0 'Ile State oxlocal agencythat carries ont; approves, nr "screening criteria." Before using the screening cdtetia, a fonds a covered action {"proponents") needs to cettiry p oject proponent shouldzst tris ttoitze v✓hether its pro- consistencywith ilie policies includedin the Delta Piano posed plan, program, or project is reinptfCom coveted action status under either the Council's administrative l �F�tii A FiAPd, ?a13 a7 . PA- 1800071 — Previously Approved Findings 20