COMPLIANCE INFO_2008-PRESENT - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Muniappa Naidu [EH] From: David Wood [dwood@aperio-inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 11:43 AM To: Sam Martinez Cc: Rayna Mills; Jim Dyke; Mia S. Brown; Rod Attebery; Kasey Foley[EH]; Linda Turkatte [EH]; Muniappa Naidu [EH]; Willy Ng [EH] Subject: Re: Gordon Research Site Thanks for the feedback and info. We posted the signs yesterday and noted some breaches in the fences ( two 21x2' holes cut in the inner perimeter fence, 2 boards out of the wooden fence to the north) . Called contractor locally to secure. We will download photos and send an email report with photos to document the sign placement and completion of section 5.4.2 of the order within the alloted time period. I will forward a work estimate to the client for the wells sampling and analytical testing. More info to follow. DKW On Dec 11, 2007, at 1:51 PM, Sam Martinez wrote: > David and Rayna, > Thank you for taking the time to review our records and taking a > few moments to discuss this site. > With respect to your action items: > 1) I would like to have the well sampled now, and while DTSC could > modify the Order under section 6.21, I would rather have such > sampling occur voluntarily. Since the well represents an exposure > pathway, a minimal approach would be to sample the well now and > determine if the water meets current, applicable drinking water > standards and criteria. Once those results are available in > conjunction with SJCEHD we can make a decision as to whether or not > additional sampling is necessary. > 2) Thank you for bringing the sign in, it is approved. > 3) With respect to the Chemical Identification and Segregation > Plan, the order describes a detailed scope of work. I provided > some information to Rayna regarding the chlorine institute, the > propane association, and compressed gas cylinder handling guides. > The plan will need to include identification procedures for solids, > liquids and gasses; these are some of the references I used in my > tenure as a member of DTSC's Emergency Response Unit. Please make > sure that the components enumerated in the Order are found in the > plan. The content of the plan is important, the order in which the > contents are presented is not. > During our conversation today, you asked if I had a template for > the Monthly Summary Report (MSR) . I do not have a template. The > order contains a good listing of the elements. The who, what, > where, when and why are important, a few hints: > 1) Actual dates or periods should be included when enumerating the > actions taken by or on behalf of the respondent with respect to the > site during the reporting month (meetings, document submission, > work) . For example: On December 12, 2007 the Project Coordinator > conducted a review of the files maintained by DTSC; > 2) Actions to be undertaken by or on behalf of the respondent in > the current month; For example: During the current month, an IH, > and a removal contractor were selected. theses entities were > provided with copies of the order as required by Section 6.25 of > the Order. There qualifications are attached for your review. > 3) Planned activities for the next month; For example: During the > next month the respondent plans to receive DTSC and SJCEHD comments > on the Chemical Identification and Segregation Plan. 1