My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MACARTHUR
>
24500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505329
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2020 8:39:34 AM
Creation date
3/4/2020 8:38:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0505329
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0006715
FACILITY_NAME
TRACY COLD STORAGE INC
STREET_NUMBER
24500
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MACARTHUR
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
TRACY
Zip
953780420
APN
25024001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
24500 S MACARTHUR DR
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`—� 1-3 <br /> 1.4 POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES <br /> As a result of the Phase I ESA, Remcor identified three potential environmental issues, <br /> which warrant conducting a Phase II site assessment. These issues include the following: <br /> • Former underground storage tank (UST) location <br /> '� • Brine solution discharges to the ground surface <br /> • The leachfield associated with septic system. <br /> The former UST (Figure 2) was used to store gasoline and was removed during the 1970s. <br /> j-- No records are available to determine the size of the UST. Plant personnel have indicated <br /> that the UST was removed because it had leaked. <br /> The brine solution that was used in the former ice manufacturing process at the site is <br /> reported to have been discharged to the ground surface (Figure 2) on at least two occasions. <br /> Each of these discharges had been estimated to have been up to 45,000 gallons. The brine <br /> that discharged could have contained chromates as corrosion inhibitors. The area in which <br /> the discharges occurred has been identified by plant personnel (Figure 2). <br /> Floor drain(s) that exist in the Engine Room also present a potential environmental concern <br /> because they drain to the septic system, and subsequently to the leachfield (Figure 2). The <br /> potential exists that waste oil and solvents that were used in the Engine Room may have been <br /> washed down the drain. The septic system leachfield could have received brine solutions, <br /> waste oil, solvents, and/or other facility wastewaters. <br /> 1.5 REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS <br /> Prior to the initiation of a subsurface investigation, certain factors should be considered. <br /> States frequently have notification requirements concerning the discovery of contaminants in <br /> soil or ground water. Whether or not a notification requirement is "triggered" can be a func- <br /> tion of many factors including such things as the particular contaminant type and concentra- <br /> tion, proximity to sensitive ecosystems, the likelihood of a completed exposure pathway, and <br /> the potential for harm to human health and the environment. Determinations concerning the <br /> :24447 <br /> i <br /> "REALISTIC SOLUTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE PROBLEMS" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.