Laserfiche WebLink
� 6.0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> t <br /> The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the observations and <br /> i. analytical data collected to date. Site, soil and ground water conditions not discovered or <br /> currently known may cause a change in the opinions presented in this report. <br /> La Laboratory analysis of ground water samples indicates the presence of significant levels of <br /> gasoline and gasoline constituents in water collected from monitoring wells MW-1 and <br /> L. MW-6. These data are consistent with previous sampling event data. <br /> Laboratory results indicate that the concentration of dissolved lead and chromium are <br /> 4.0 below the MCL's for all ground water samples analyzed. <br /> 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> +� The lateral and vertical extent of gasoline contaminated soil and ground water have not <br /> been defined to date. Additional soil and ground water investigation is required at this site <br /> to fully define the limits of contamination. AGS recommends that a work plan be <br /> prepared to address the definition of the contaminant boundaries, and to investigate <br /> possible remediation alternatives. The San Joaquin Public Health Services has requested <br /> that this work plan be prepared and submitted to their office by September 15, 1995. <br /> Because total dissolved lead and chromium are below the MCL's, AGS recommends <br /> eliminating lead and chromium analyses from subsequent quarterly sampling events. <br /> Water samples were not collected from the two supply wells located on the site. Samples <br /> L. were previously collected from the supply well pressure tank and indicated non detectable <br /> levels of BTEX. Sample taps have not been installed near the well heads to allow for <br /> more representative sampling. AGS recommends that spigots be installed near each well <br /> �. head prior to the collection of new samples from these wells. <br /> In a letter to Remcor, dated April 4, 1995, the San Joaquin Public Health Services <br /> L• requested that slug test data collected from MW-6 be provided, and that the methodology <br /> employed be described in an addendum to their PIER. In discussions with AGS, Remcor <br /> disclosed that the slug test consisted of removing approximately one liter of water from <br /> the well and monitoring the rate of change of the water level within the well. <br /> It is the opinion of AGS that the data obtained by removing such a small volume of water <br /> yields unreliable aquifer characteristic information. Therefore, AGS recommends that <br /> Lo <br /> American Geological Services, Inc. <br /> CA95DE-029 <br /> Lo 11 <br />