Laserfiche WebLink
the boring with neat cement. This well was filled to grade with cement and finished flush to the <br /> existing asphalt surface. <br /> i <br /> ' 3.3 Excavation <br /> Prior to beginning the excavation, the site was prepared by removing trees, a storage shed, <br /> asphalt and concrete, and other materials in the vicinity of the anticipated excavation area. The <br /> contaminated soil stockpile area was prepared by removing vegetation and placing plastic <br /> sheeting on the ground surface. All aspects of the remedial excavations were witnessed or <br /> coordinated by AGS and San Joaquin County PHSIEHD personnel. <br /> A large diameter water line was identified that crossed the proposed area of excavation. The line <br /> provides service water to the cold storage facility from the above ground water storage tank. <br /> Because service could not be interrupted, a two phase excavation was developed to prevent <br /> damage to the water line. <br /> ' The firsthase of excavation p ca atzon began along the edge of the concrete reservoir located to the north <br /> ' of the former UST location (Figure 2). Structural limitations to the west, north and east <br /> prevented the removal of additional soils in these directions. The excavation was advanced to <br /> the south into the access road until field observations indicated that contaminant levels had <br /> ' decreased significantly. <br /> The second phase of excavation was performed to the west of the water line. Physical and <br /> '• structural limitations to the north and east prevented the removal of additional contaminated soils <br /> in those directions. The western boundary of the excavation was limited to within the area <br /> bounded by the fenceline. <br /> The volume of soil removed duringthe first phase of excavation included 917 cubic yards of <br /> P <br /> uncontaminated overburden and 1,147 cubic yards of gasoline impacted soil. The volume of soil <br /> removed during the second phase of excavation included 300 cubic yards of uncontaminated <br /> overburden and 375 cubic yards of gasoline impacted soil. The total volume of gasoline <br /> impacted soil removed during the remedial excavation was 1,522 cubic yards. This material was <br /> ' stockpiled in the open field area to the northwest of the excavation, on top of plastic sheeting. <br /> Soil samples were collected periodically from the interior, sidewalls and bottom of the <br /> excavation for headspace analysis. This was conducted in order to monitor the limits of soil <br /> excavation and to distinguish between contaminated soil and clean overburden. Soil samples <br /> ' collected for headspace readings were placed in a ziplock type storage bag and the fuel <br /> hydrocarbons were allowed to volatilize by warming the sample in the sun. When sufficient <br /> volatilization had occurred, the probe of a photoionization detector (PID) was inserted into the <br /> headspace of the bag and the resultant readings were recorded. PID headspace readings were <br /> also recorded during the collection of samples retained for laboratory analyses. <br /> • <br /> American Geological Services, Inc. <br /> CA95 DE-029 <br /> 6 <br />