Laserfiche WebLink
• 09 September 2002 <br />' AGE-NC Project No, 98-0450 <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br /> 2.2. GROUND WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION <br />' The ground water levels in all six wells were allowed to recharged to a minimum of 80%of the initial <br /> well volume prior to sample collection. Subsequently,groundwater samples were collected from each <br /> well using a new disposable plastic bailer. Each water sample was then transferred into three 40-m1 <br /> volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials containing 0.5 ml 18%HCl as a sample preservative and a one- <br /> liter amber bottle without preservative. The samples were then labeled and placed in a chilled <br /> container for transport under chain-of-custody to McCampbell Analytical, Inc. (MAI) of Pacheco, <br /> California, a.State of California - Department of Health Service (DHS)-certified laboratory. The <br /> samples were analyzed for the following: <br /> tTotal petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) and total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons quantified as diesel(TPH-d) in accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified <br />' for gasoline and diesel, respectively, <br /> Benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene(BTEX) and methyl tert-butyl ether(MTBE) in <br /> accordance with EPA Method 8020, <br />' The fuel additives di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary-butyl etherl,ETBE meth <br /> ( } y <br /> tertiary-butyl ether(MTBE),tertiary-amyl methyl ether(TAME) and tertiary butanol(TBA) <br />' in accordance with EPA Method 8260 Modified, respectively. <br /> 2.3. SOIL-VAPOR EXTRACTION <br />' On 22 February 2002, the soil vapor extraction pump motor on the electric catalytic oxidizer failed; <br /> the SVE unit was removed for service. Because progressively lower concentrations of volatile <br /> hydrocarbons have been extracted from the SVE and air-sparging system while electrical costs have <br /> remained high, currently beyond the cost effective remediation goals for the site, AGE proposed to <br /> continue to extract hydrocarbons utilizing an active vacuum blower, which was installed at the site <br /> on 19 March 2002. <br /> The vacuum blower was monitored o ed monthly. The flow rate of extracted soil-gas (influent) was <br /> measured using direct measure flow meter, and vacuum potential was measured at the two-inch <br /> influent line using a magnehelic vacuum gauge. <br /> The organic-vapor concentration in the extracted soil-gas stream was measured prior to entering the <br />' blower using an organic vapor meter (OVM) equipped with a photo-ionization detector: PTD <br /> (Thermo Environmental 580A, 10-OeV, calibrated to isobutylene 100 parts per billion). <br />' Three sets of soil-vapor samples were collected during the second quarter of 2002. The samples were <br /> collected in Tedlar vapor bags using a vacuum pump attached to the influent and effluent stream <br />' Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />