Laserfiche WebLink
' 13 September 2001 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No. 98-0450 <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br />' stream_ These samples were labeled,placed in a pre-chilled cooler and transported under chain-of- <br /> custody to Associated Laboratories in Orange, California. <br />' Three sets of samples were collected during June, July and August 2001. Samples were collected on <br /> 21 June, 17 July and 09 August 2001 in Tedlar vapor bags using a vacuum pump attached to the <br /> influent and effluent stream.The samples were labeled,placed in a pre-chilled cooler and transported <br /> under chain-of-custody to MAI. <br /> The samples were analyzed for; <br />' 0 TPH-g in accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified and <br />' • BTEX and MTBE in accordance with EPA Method 8020. <br />' The results of the laboratory analysis are summarized in Table 4. <br />, . 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br />' 06 June 2001. Ground water flow direction was determined by contouring the water elevations on <br /> a scaled site plan(Figure 3). The contaminant impact to ground water was assessed from the ground <br /> water laboratory data. <br /> From field data collected at the SVE remediation system between early May and early August 2001, <br /> AGE determined the average TPH-g concentration, the average flow rate and calculated the <br />' approximate mass and volume of gasoline removed. <br />' 3.1. RELATIVE GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> The depths to ground water from the tops of the monitoring well casings were measured at 46.34 to <br /> 47.70 feet. The corresponding ground water elevations ranged from 1.27 to 1.67 feet below mean <br /> sea level. <br />' - Since the last quarterly monitoring event,ground water elevation has decreased an average 0.74 feet - - <br /> at the site. The ground water elevation data for the well network during the latest ground water <br /> Ilemonitoring event is depicted in Figure 3. The ground water flow direction determined during this <br /> monitoring event was toward the south to southwest, with a hydraulic gradient of approximately <br /> 0.004 (Figure 3). <br /> 1 <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />