Laserfiche WebLink
t29 January 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 98-0450 <br /> ' Page 3 of 6 <br /> ' BTEX and MTBE in accordance with EPA Method 8020. <br /> The results of the laboratory analysis are summarized in Table 4. <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> ' Ground water elevations were determined b subtracting the measured depths-to-water from the <br /> Y g p <br /> ' surveyed casing elevations. Ground water flow direction was determined by contouring the water <br /> elevations on a scaled site plan (Figure 3). <br /> The SVE unit typically operated at an average 145 to 180 cubic feet per minute (cfm) during the <br /> period and the IAS unit operated daily. The mass of TPH-g hydrocarbons extracted by the SVE <br /> system during the garter was calculated to be approximately 500 gallons. <br /> 1 <br /> 3.1. RELATIVE GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> The depths to ground water from the tops of the monitoring well casings were measured at 46.88 <br /> to 47.48 feet. The corresponding ground water elevations ranged from 1.37 to 1.86 feet below mean <br /> ' sea level. <br /> Over the last quarter, ground water elevation has decreased an average 0.5 feet at the site. The <br /> ' ground water elevation data for the well network during the latest ground water monitoring event <br /> was depicted in Figure 3. The ground water flow direction determined during this monitoring event <br /> was toward the south to southwest, with a hydraulic gradient of 0.005 feet/feet (Figure 3). <br /> ' Based on a southerly to southwesterly flow direction within the area contained by the six monitoring <br /> wells, wells MW-5 and BMW-2 are down-gradient from the former dispenser system and wells <br /> BMW-1 and BMW-2 are down gradient from the former UST area. <br /> Table 1 shows.the screen intervals for monitoring wells BMW-3, BMW-4 and BMW-5 and the <br /> assumed screen intervals for monitoring wells BMW-1 and BMW-2. The analytical results obtained <br /> are believed to be representative of the dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations in the shallow ground <br /> water at the site, as the wells are screened across the ground water table. <br /> ' 3.2. GROUND WATER SAMPLES ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> • TPH-g was detected in all samples at concentrations ranging from 73 micrograms per liter (µg/1) in <br /> sample BMW-3 to 16,000 µg11 in sample BMW-4. TPH-d concentrations were detected in the <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironment2l,Inc. <br />