My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOWER SACRAMENTO
>
18970
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516743
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2020 12:42:06 PM
Creation date
3/4/2020 11:30:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0516743
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0012768
FACILITY_NAME
WOODBRIDGE ARCO-STORE #5650
STREET_NUMBER
18970
STREET_NAME
LOWER SACRAMENTO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
WOODBRIDGE
Zip
95258
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
18970 LOWER SACRAMENTO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Report on Soil and Ground-Water Evaluation September 11, 1989 <br /> Proposed ARCO Station, Woodbridge, California AGS 39044-1 <br /> Well Development and Ground-Water Samplins <br /> On June 20, 1988, a geologist from Applied GeoSystems was at the site to measure depths <br /> to water in the monitoring wells, subjectively analyze the ground water in these wells, and <br /> develop the wells. Following initial water-level measurements, the water in the wells was <br /> subjectively examined by lowering approximately half the length of a clean Teflon-bailer <br /> past the air-water interface to obtain a sample. Any subjective evidence of product <br /> detected in the wells was recorded. No floating product or sheen was observed in the wells <br /> at that time. The monitoring wells were developed -using a 4-inch-diameter PVC surge <br /> block alternately raised and lowered through the water.column in each well. Following <br /> surging, the wells were pumped using an air-lift pump to remove excess sediment from the <br /> wells. As required by SJLHD guidelines, the wells were not purged or sampled until a <br /> minimum of 24 hours had passed after development. <br /> On June 22, 1989, our geologist returned to the site to purge and sample the monitoring <br /> wells. Water level measurement and subjective-analyses were performed on the wells as <br /> described above. _No subjective evidence of hydrocarbon contamination was observed in the <br /> monitoring wells. The wells were .purged of approximately four volumes of water using a <br /> stainless steel helical rotor, electric submersible pump. During purging, well discharge was <br /> monitored for pH, temperature, and conductivity. Stabilization of these parameters was <br /> used to indicate that formation water was entering the well. Water purged from the wells <br /> r <br /> 15 <br /> Apn/ied GeoSystems <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.