My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_3Q13 QSSR QRSR QMR
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LINCOLN
>
1444
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0527031
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_3Q13 QSSR QRSR QMR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2020 1:52:18 PM
Creation date
3/4/2020 11:55:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
3Q13 QSSR QRSR QMR
RECORD_ID
PR0527031
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0018318
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER COLUMBO / TOSCANA BAKERY
STREET_NUMBER
1444
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
LINCOLN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16503005
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1444 S LINCOLN ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
946
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Is Data Valid?(circle) Preservation Temperature <br /> `/ YESv <br /> Stanter <br /> Stantec Lab Validation Form-Soil and Water <br /> Matrix <br /> Project/Client: Tidewater Stockton <br /> Project No.: 211602384.600.94041 <br /> Lab Work Order No.: Kiff#85467 <br /> Date of Validation: 10/17/13 <br /> Date of Analysis: 07/19/13 through 07/24/13 <br /> Date of Sampling: 07/16/13 through 07/18/13 <br /> Completed By: Tony Giglini <br /> Circle/Highlight <br /> Yes or No <br /> Signature: <br /> 1. Was the analysis the one requested? es No <br /> 2. Do the sample number(s)on the chain-of-custody(COC) match the one(s)that es No <br /> appear on the laboratory data sheet? <br /> 3. Were samples prepared (extracted,filtered, etc.)within EPA holding times? Yes No <br /> 4. Once prepared/extracted,were the samples analyzed within the EPA holding times? es No <br /> 5. Were Laboratory blanks performed, if so,were they below non-detect? Yes No <br /> 6. Are the units correct?(i.e., soil samples in mg/kg or pg/g,water samples mg/L, Ng/L, Yes No <br /> and air samples in volume mg/m^3,etc.) <br /> 7. Were appropriate Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) samples es No <br /> included in the laboratory batch sample? <br /> 8. In lieu of MS/MSD,were surrogate spike (SS)/surrogate spike duplicate(SSD), or es No <br /> laboratory control spike (LCS)/laboratory control spike duplicate (LCSD) samples <br /> included in the laboratory batch samples? <br /> 9. Were MS/MSD(or SS/SSD)within the acceptable range of%recovery(i.e., approx yes No <br /> 80-120%depending on analyte)? <br /> 10.Were MS/MSD (or SS/SSD)values used to calculate Relative Percent Difference Yes No <br /> (RPD)? <br /> Yes No <br /> 11.Were Relative Percent Difference values within the acceptable range (i.e. ±25%)? <br /> If any answer is no, explain why and what corrective action was taken: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.