My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AND BIOSPARGE EVALUATION REPORT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LINCOLN
>
1444
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0527031
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AND BIOSPARGE EVALUATION REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2020 1:37:52 PM
Creation date
3/4/2020 12:03:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AND BIOSPARGE EVALUATION REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0527031
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0018318
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER COLUMBO / TOSCANA BAKERY
STREET_NUMBER
1444
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
LINCOLN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16503005
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1444 S LINCOLN ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
311
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Former Columbo/Toscana Bakery - 2 - 29 April 2009 <br /> 1444 S. Lincoln St., Stockton <br /> inconclusive data results for the 2008 TS pilot test. As a result of the inconclusive 2008 pilot study, <br /> PSC requests collection of additional site soil and groundwater data during installation of the new <br /> monitoring wells, for the purpose of further assessment of the viability of the remedy prior to submitting . <br /> a workplan for a biosparging pilot study. Per PSC, the proposed new wells installation and sampling <br /> will take up to 5 weeks to complete, including drilling and additional saturated soil sampling and <br /> analyses consisting of intrinsic permeability of the aquifer zone, dissolved iron, total aerobic <br /> heterotrophs and total aerobic hydrocarbon degraders (bacteria population), ammonia as nitrogen, <br /> total organic carbon, phosphorous as ortho-phosphate, and sulfate. Additional groundwater sampling <br /> would include alkalinity as CaCO3 for CO2, and ferric and ferrous iron. <br /> TheEvaluation includes a section titled Preliminary Plan for Biosparge Pilot Test, which does not <br /> ' provide the level of detail necessary for a pilot study workplan, but does include discussion of baseline <br /> groundwater sampling prior to the pilot study, including ammonia as nitrogen, nitrate-nitrite, <br /> orthophosphate, bacteria population, biological oxygen demand (BOD),-and chemical oxygen demand <br /> (COD). During the pilot study, PSC would conduct an evaluation of the effects of impermeable layers <br /> ' on airflow, and determine injection bubble radius and oxygen consumption rates. Inclusion of the full <br /> scale system design will be included in a Remedial Action Plan at some unspecified future date. <br /> The Workplan states Sara.Lee has an agreement with the neighboring former Texaco.(TX) and other <br /> nearby sites to co=monitor wells on the same quarter y sc e u e an to are ata ort a sties; wit <br /> the eventual goal to reduce the number of new wells needed for monitoring the inferred commingled <br /> plume. The Site wells will use the new designation "CT_" (Columbo/Toscana) followed by "MW- (well <br /> number) - (screened zone depth bgs)". The three proposed wells are shown on air photograph Figure <br /> 10 as: <br /> • CT—MW-8-80 and CT—MW-8-120 are located approximately 20'to 40' southwest of the former <br /> USTs (near A-zone well TX—MW-14). <br /> • CT MW-9-120 is located approximately 200' east of the former USTs (near B-zone well <br /> TX—MW-21-80). <br /> The proposed wells were designed to address the following data gaps at the Site: . <br /> ' hydraulic conductivity for all aquifer zones, <br /> horizontal and vertical groundwater gradients, <br /> • lateral and vertical extent of contamination, <br /> • determination of extent of onsite impacts versus offsite sources impacts to the site. <br /> 1 A schedule with proposed dates of the tasks necessary for the implementation of the Workplan was not, <br /> provided in the Workplan. <br /> 1 The VIS Report provides the results of the shallow soil gas survey conducted to evaluate potential <br /> threats from vapor intrusion to workers at the Site, a construction company warehouse in a <br /> commercially zoned block, with no known plans for redevelopment as residential housing, schools, or <br /> day care centers. Eight shallow soil gas probes (SG-Test [tank pit] and SG-1 through SG-7) were <br /> �., installed and sampled in and around the building for petroleum hydrocarbons constituents as vapor. <br /> Although maximum results were reported at SG-4 as TPHg, 18,000 minrams per cubic meter <br /> (ug/m); benzene, 68 ug/m3; toluene, 1,800 ug/m3; ethylbenzene, 62 ug/m ; and xylenes, 222 ug/m3; <br /> 1 the VIS Report states the SG-4 data are suspected as unrepresentative of Site conditions (higher that <br /> actual) due to sampler error when insufficient purging resulted in a lower than usual sample volume <br /> collected in the Summa canister, reportedly by over tightening of line connections that caused <br /> restriction in the vapor line to the Summa canister during leak testing prior to sample collection. <br /> r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.