Laserfiche WebLink
Excavation Remediation Report Advanced Environmental Concepts,Inc. <br /> w <br /> 5.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AND SAMPLING <br /> w In order to evaluate the groundwater condition beneath the property following completion of the remedial <br /> excavation and to calculate the hydraulic gradient beneath the site, a total of 3 groundwater monitoring wells <br /> were installed, developed, and sampled in accordance with AEC's August 1998 "Confirmation Water <br /> Sampling Work Plan". San Joaquin County approved the workplan prior to implementation and provided <br /> oversight of the procedures. The following sections describe methods and procedures performed and results <br /> of laboratory analyses of samples collected during the post-remedial excavation groundwater assessment. <br /> 5.1 Boring Locations and Methods <br /> Borings identified as W-1, W-2, and W-3 were positioned within the south, east, and north areas of <br /> the remedial excavation limits, respectively. Figure 8 illustrates the positioning of these borings. <br /> w <br /> The borings were completed as groundwater monitoring wells in order to provide analytical data for <br /> evaluation of groundwater conditions following the completion of the remedial excavation <br /> �,. procedures and water depth information for hydraulic gradient calculations. <br /> The borings were advanced using a Mobile B-61 Drill Rig equipped with an 8-inch diameter, <br /> continuous flight auger in accordance with ASTM Method D 1452-80 for soil investigations and <br /> `" sampling by auger borings. The augers were steam cleaned prior to drilling and between each <br /> boring in order to minimize potential cross-hole or downhole contamination. Soil lithoiogy and other <br /> visual data was recorded on field boring logs in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification <br /> 4.0 System for visual description and identification of soils. <br /> 5.2 Soil Sampling/Analyses <br /> V <br /> Soil samples were collected through the auger into 1.5-inch diameter by 6-inch long brass sleeves <br /> driven in a split spoon sampler by a 140-pound hammer with a 30-inch drop, in accordance with <br /> r. ASTM Methods D 1586.84 for split-barrel sampling of soil and D 1587-83 for thin-walled tube <br /> sampling of soils. The brass sleeves and sampler were washed in an Alconox solution and double <br /> rinsed in clean de-ionized water prior to each use. Soil samples were driven at the estimated <br /> capillary fringe(11 feet BGL)within each boring in order to evaluate conditions of soil at or near the <br /> soil/groundwater interface. The blow counts, sample recovery, and lithology were recorded on the <br /> field logs. Soil samples were sealed with teflon tape, capped, labeled, placed in a cooler with frozen <br /> blue ice, and transported to Baseline Onsite Analysis, a California Certified Laboratory under Chain- <br /> of-Custody protocol for analysis. Laboratory results are presented in Table 9. Laboratory reports <br /> and Chain-of-Custody documentation are contained within Appendix B. <br /> Ago <br /> w <br /> L <br /> Project: AEC 96C-1707 10 <br /> •ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPTS WITH DESIGN W MIND - <br /> 4400 ASHE ROAD.*206 • BAKERSFIELD.CA 93313 8051831.1646 FAX 805/831-1771 <br /> I.r <br />