My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOUISE
>
2112
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0530079
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2020 2:38:23 PM
Creation date
3/4/2020 2:32:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0530079
PE
2954
FACILITY_ID
FA0019782
FACILITY_NAME
LAGUE SALES
STREET_NUMBER
2112
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LOUISE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19816003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2112 E LOUISE AVE
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 2 <br /> `.. N./ <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 9:17 AM <br /> To: 'Richard Gandolfo' <br /> Subject: RE: Lathrop Piezometer <br /> I just noticed you said WEST of McKinley....true? <br /> I was told yesterday EAST.... <br /> if WEST, my calcs put this on RR property? true? <br /> From: Richard Gandolfo [mailto:rgandolfo@engeo.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 8:52 AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Lathrop Piezometer <br /> I was going by the recommendation from Adrian at the EHD office. What would be the appropriate <br /> overbore for the '/]pipe? <br /> The original bore appears to be 6 inches. <br /> I'll contact you when I get more information. <br /> Richard <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 8:45 AM <br /> To: Richard Gandolfo <br /> Subject: RE: Lathrop Piezometer <br /> Richard, <br /> I'm not sure who OWNS this well. any thoughts? My closest site there is California <br /> Natural Products, 1250 E. Lathrop Rd. They are conducting a ground water <br /> investigation under the CVRWQCB lead, Tim O'Brien the contact. They have wells, <br /> piezos, etc all around the site. I can't find this one based on your description, but I have <br /> doubts that it's removal will go unnoticed and I'm reluctant to issue a destruction permit <br /> until I feel more confident about who owns it. Kleinfelder is consulting for CNP, Joe Zilles <br /> is the contact. I recommend you contact them to verify that this well/piezo is NOT <br /> theirs/not needed. <br /> I'm under the impression this well is in the County right of way/roadside. true? if so, you'll <br /> need a SJ County Public Works Encroachment permit to gain access to destroy it. have <br /> you checked with Public Works for the encroachment permit that installed it? you should. <br /> why 12" overbore? why so large? are you under the impression a 12" auger installed <br /> this 1/2 inch well? If not, I will approve the same size auger or one slightly larger for he <br /> o/bore. <br /> 2-3 what? weeks? days? months? <br /> 6/18/2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.