Laserfiche WebLink
Geofo ' af%,chnks Inc. . . Page 2 <br /> { Sinclair Trucking-QMR <br /> Project No. 320.2 <br /> November 8, 1999 <br /> 4. MW-1 contains low concentrations of contamination that has migrated downgradient to <br />' MW-4, which only has trace concentrations of BTEX compounds. <br /> 5. MTBE and the other oxygenated fuel compounds were not detected for a second time. <br /> It is recommended that: <br />' 1. That testing for MTBE and the other OFCs should be discontinued. <br /> 2. Future investigation of the extent of contamination should consider the following site- <br /> specific conditions: <br />' • The lateral and vertical extent of the clay encountered in MW-4, which could act as a <br /> barrier to vertical contaminant migration. <br /> • The apparent thin zone of contaminant migration through the sandy unit between 12 <br /> and 16 feet below ground surface (bgs). <br /> • Predominant direction of groundwater flow. <br /> 3. Future monitoring should include a complete natural attenuation parameter analysis. <br /> 4. Several more rounds of quarterly monitoring should take place prior to any additional <br />' investigative work in order to determine if the concentrations in MW-4 continue to <br /> decrease and to determine if the gradient direction is stable to the north-northeast. <br />' 1.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> 1.1 Hydrology of Site <br /> On September 22, 1999, Del-Tech Geotechnical Support personnel measured the four <br /> monitoring wells for depth to groundwater. The average depth to water was measured to be <br /> approximately 11.5 feet from the top of casing measuring point. The groundwater gradient <br /> and bearing of flow were calculated to be 0.0041 ft/ft, flowing N25°E, respectively. This <br /> hydrologic behavior is consistent with previous groundwater gradients measured at this site, <br />' however is a little more to the north. This may be a result of having the wells Iaser surveyed <br /> which changed the spatial relationship of the wells on the map. <br /> Figure 2 is a map showing both the water table and intermediate groundwater gradients. <br />' 1.2 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> On September 22, 1999, Del-Tech Geotechnical Support personnel arrived on-site, opened <br /> the wells, and measured the depth to water with an electrically actuated sounding tape. The <br /> water level reading was recorded to an accuracy of 0.01 foot. In wells where free floating <br /> product was suspected, a clear disposable bailer was used to gauge the interface. <br />' Stagnant water in the well casing was purged using a Centrifugal pump as recorded in the <br /> field logs (Appendix Q. The rate of well purging was monitored. The wells were purged of <br /> at least three casing volumes or until the groundwater parameters (temperature, conductivity, <br /> and pH) had stabilized (Appendix C) indicating that water, representative of actual aquifer <br /> conditions, was entering the well. Groundwater parameter stabilization was characterized by <br />' three successive readings within 10%. <br /> Before a sample was collected, the well's water level was allowed to recharge to at least 80% <br /> of its initial level. All water removed from the monitoring wells and not used as a sample, <br />' was placed in a 55 gallon DOT (Department of Transportation 17-H) approved container that <br /> is properly labeled and temporally stored on-site. <br />