Laserfiche WebLink
Creohgical Technics Inc Page 2 <br /> ' Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No, 1030.2 <br /> September 29,2003 <br /> 1.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> r1.1 Hydrogeology of Site <br /> ' On July 23, 2003, the depth to groundwater was measured in all of the monitoring wells <br /> prior to purging. Depths to groundwater, at the site, averaged 9.50 feet below the top of <br /> casing. The average groundwater elevation for the July 2003 event was 67.12 feet above <br /> mean sea level (MSL). Site-specific groundwater bearing and slope were calculated and <br /> found to be N65°E @ 0.0040 ft/ft. These results are consistent with historical groundwater <br /> bearing and slope for this site. <br /> ! Groundwater elevation increased 2.88 feet since the April 2003 monitoring event. This <br /> raise in groundwater elevation corresponds with seasonally high groundwater elevation <br /> ' measurements recorded at this site between June and August. There is flood irrigation north <br /> and east of the site, which may explain the seasonal increase. <br /> Vertical groundwater gradients were calculated for the site using the MW-1/MW-101 well <br /> pair and found to be negative. This is the first time a negative vertical gradient has been <br /> recorded at the site. The site-specific vertical groundwater gradient is -0.0274 ft/ft. MW-1 <br /> is screened from 5 to 20 feet bgs and MW-101 is screened from 29.5 to 34.5 feet bgs. <br /> Vertical groundwater gradient calculations have been performed at regular intervals since <br /> ' the installation of MW-101 on April 12, 2002. The vertical gradient calculated for the July <br /> 2003 monitoring event is one order of magnitude greater than the horizontal gradient. The <br /> historical vertical gradients have been approximately one order of magnitude less than the <br /> ' horizontal gradients. <br /> Groundwater elevation, bearing and slope were calculated using data gathered from MW-2, <br /> MW-3 and MW-4 during the July 23, 2003, monitoring event and the results are <br /> summarized in Table 1 of Appendix A. Table 2 of Appendix A summarizes the vertical <br /> groundwater gradient calculations. <br /> 1.2 Groundwater g <br /> Sam lin Procedure <br /> Sampling <br /> ' On July 23, 2003, Del-Tech Geotechnical Support Service personnel arrived on-site, opened <br /> the wells and measured the depth to water with an electrically actuated sounding tape. The <br /> water level reading was recorded to an accuracy of 0.01 foot. If free floating product had <br /> been suspected, a clear disposable bailer would have been used to gauge the interface. No <br /> floating product was observed during this sampling event. <br /> Stagnant water in the well casing was purged using a Waterra pump and dedicated tubing. <br /> The rate of well purging was monitored. The well was purged of at least three casing <br /> volumes until the groundwater parameters (temperature, conductivity and pH) had stabilized <br />