My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
1521
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0507077
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2020 1:03:32 PM
Creation date
3/5/2020 10:17:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
PRE 2019
RECORD_ID
PR0507077
PE
2229
FACILITY_ID
FA0005303
FACILITY_NAME
HOLT OF CALIFORNIA
STREET_NUMBER
1521
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16337015
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1521 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
486
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
■ Choice 1 - Periodic AST inspections by the owner are necessary. Also, Formal <br />External Inspections by a certified inspector and leak tests by owner or owner's <br />designee are necessary at 5 year intervals. Lastly, Formal Internal Inspections by <br />certified inspector are necessary at 10 year intervals. <br />■ Choice l - Periodic AST inspections by the owner are necessary. Also, leak tests by <br />owner or owner's designee are necessary at 1 year intervals. Lastly, Formal External <br />Inspections by certified inspector are necessary at 5 year intervals. <br />Notice that two inspection alternatives or owner choices of types of inspections are given. <br />STI SP001 provides alternatives where warranted in an effort to equalize the risks <br />associated with each alternative. In this case, these two choices were given because <br />entering an AST poses significant risk to the inspector. Also, many shop -fabricated <br />ASTs do not have manways and therefore entry is difficult. Noted though is the fact that <br />Formal Internal Inspections provide more information about the condition of an AST than <br />Formal External Inspections combined with leak tests and therefore the former method is <br />provided with longer intervals between inspections than the latter. Hence, if we can <br />reduce the frequency of internal inspection while also maintaining equivalent protection, <br />we can reduce the risk of harm to human health and the environment. <br />To the owner of tanks, reduced inspections by the addition of safeguards is money in their pocket. <br />To the regulator, targeting inspections at the tanks that are installed without safeguards prevents <br />leaks. Implied in Table 5.5 in SPOO 1 is the encouragement for a tank owner to improve a tank <br />installation to reduce its risk to the environment. By applying generally accepted good industry <br />and engineering practices, such as those given for Category 1 tanks, the tank owner is rewarded <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.