My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAGNOLIA
>
510
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0521824
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2020 12:23:11 PM
Creation date
3/5/2020 10:27:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0521824
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0014819
FACILITY_NAME
CSU STANISLAUS / STKN MULTI-CAMPUS
STREET_NUMBER
510
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MAGNOLIA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
510 E MAGNOLIA ST
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Anary Environmental Assessment Report <br /> Pittman Elementary School,Stockton,CA <br /> December 10,2003 <br /> Page 15 <br /> ' Table 9—Laboratory Analytical Results (Structure D line)_—continued <br /> Lead Lead <br /> Re ortin Limit Ran e m k : 0.81 - 1.1 Re ,,in Limit Ran e m k : 0.81 -1.1 <br /> PRG m /k 150 PRG m /k 150 <br /> Leads read PRC m /k 255 Leads read PRG m k 255 <br /> Building Sample to Date Building Sample 1D Date <br /> Delta Center Garage 3638F-P29-S 8/8/2003 160 House 5 3638F-P49-S 8/8/2003 88 <br /> 3638F-P29-S 8/8/2003 15 3638F-P50-S 8/8/2003 71 <br /> 3638F-P74-S 8/13/2003 14 3638F-PSI-S 8/11/2003 27 <br /> 3638F-P75-S 8/13/2003 370 3638F-P52-S 8/11/2003 100 <br /> 3638F-P75-D 8//3/2003 17 House 6 3638F-P53-S 8111/2003 21 <br /> House 1 3638F-P28-S 8/8/2003 58 3638F-P54-S 8/11/2003 110 <br /> 3638F-P30-S 8/8/2003 87 3638F-P54-D 8/1//2003 12 <br /> 3638F-P31-S*** 8/8/2003 63** 3638F-PSS-S 8/!1/2003 67 <br /> 638F-P32-S*** 8/8/2003L 4.5•• 1 3638F-P56-S8/11/2003 130 <br /> 3638F-P33-S - 8/8/2003 65 3638F-P56-D 8/11/2003 /0 <br /> 3638F-P71-8 8/12/2003 97 Garage 3638F-P57-S 8/11/2003 140 <br /> Garage 1 3638F-P34-S 8/8/2003 270 3638F-P57-D 8/11/2003 15 <br /> 3638F-P34-D 8/812003 18 3638F-P62-S 8/12/2003 79 <br /> 3638F-P70-S 8/12/20031 8.2 3638F-P63-S 8/12/2003 33 <br /> 3638F-P72-S 8/12/2003 3.1 3638F-P64-S 8/12/2003 94 <br /> House 2 3638F-P35-S 8/8/2003 86 House 7 3638F-P58-S 8/11/20031 4 600 <br /> 3638F-P36-S 8/8/2003 7.1 3638F-P58-D 8/11/2003 430 <br /> 3638F-P37-S 8/8/2003 55 3638F-P59-S 8/11/2003 580 <br /> 3638F-P76-S 8/13/2003 63 3638F-P59-D 8/11/2003 21 <br /> • House 3 3638F-P38-S8/8/2003 55 3638F-P60-S 8/11/2003 160 <br /> 7638E-P39-S 8/8/2003 100 3638E-P60-D 8//1/2003 31 <br /> 363SF-P40-S 8/8/2003 8.8 3638F-P61-S 8/11/2003 140 <br /> 3638E-P41-S 8/8/2003 73 3638F-P61-D 8/1//2003 33 <br /> Garage 2 3638F-P42-S 8/8/2003 76 Garage 3 3638F-P65-S 8/12/2003 48 <br /> 3638F- 3-S8/8/2003 170 3638F-P66-S 8/12/2003 140 <br /> 3638F- -D8/812003 IS 3638F-P66-D 8/12/2003 13 <br /> 3638F-P44-S 8/8/2003 23 3638F-P67-S 8/12/2003 39 <br /> 3638F-P69-S 8/12/2003 4.6 3638F-P68-8 8/12/2003 16 <br /> House 4 3638F-P45-S 8/8/2003 6.3 <br /> 3638F-P46-S 8/8/2003 27 <br /> 3638F-P47-S 8/8/2003 8.5 <br /> 3638F-P48-S 8/8/2003 12 <br /> mg/kg:milligrams per kilogram,parts per million <br /> PRG:USEPA Region 9 Residential Preliminary Remediation Goal <br /> Leadspread PRG:DTSC Preliminary Remediation Goal calculated using the Leadspread 7 Model <br /> Notes:Italicized items are subsurface samples and their analytical results. <br /> Concentrations in bold-faced font are above the DTSC PRG value. <br /> Samples followed by asterisks(*)indicate a second sample and its counterpart. <br /> The laboratory analytical results indicate that one of the three paint chip samples would be considered to <br /> be lead-based paint according to the California Department of Health Services (DHS) standard of a lead <br /> concentration of 5,000 parts per million (ppm). The paint chip sample collected from the western portion <br /> of the north wall of the warehouse building had a lead concentration of 298,086 ppm, well above the <br /> DHS standard. Laboratory analytical results of the paint chip samples analyzed for lead are summarized <br /> in Table 10, on the next page. Laboratory report sheets indicating analytical methods used, detection <br /> • limits, and the results of the analyses are included in Appendix B. <br /> IW CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.