My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAGNOLIA
>
510
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0521824
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2020 12:23:11 PM
Creation date
3/5/2020 10:27:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0521824
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0014819
FACILITY_NAME
CSU STANISLAUS / STKN MULTI-CAMPUS
STREET_NUMBER
510
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MAGNOLIA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
510 E MAGNOLIA ST
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Ainary Environmental Assessment Report <br /> Pittman Elementary School,Stockton,CA <br /> December 10,2003 <br /> Page 20 <br /> Table 15—Labo atory Anal tical Results (Northern UST Site —Groundwater <br /> Constituent: Acetone Benzene MEK Chloroform Methylene Chloride Toluene <br /> MCL: 1 L 150 <br /> rSample ID Date <br /> 'L3638F-VB4 <br /> F-VB108/11/2003 3.7* <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 0.33* <1,0 <br /> F-VB2 08/12/2003 15 0.20* 2.8* 0.70* <5.0 <1.0 <br /> F-VB3 08/13/2003 <10 <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 0.25* 0.31* <br /> 08/12/2003 4.1* <1.0 <5.0 0.99* 0.47* 0.24*Blank 8/13/2003 <10 <1.0 <5.0 <1.0 0.41* <1.0 <br /> gg/L:micrograms per liter <br /> <:not detected at the reporting limit shown <br /> Detected concentrations are below laboratory reporting limits and are estimated(j"flagged). <br /> MEK:methyl ethyl ketone,2-butanone <br /> MCL:California Department of Health Services Primary Maximum Contaminant Level <br /> 7.6 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS RESULTS <br /> .The laboratory analytical results indicate that no PCBs were detected in any of the soil samples. <br /> Laboratory report sheets indicating analytical methods used, detection limits, and the results of the <br /> analyses are included in Appendix B. <br /> No PCBs were detected in the equipment blank sample 3638F-rinsate-8/11/03. <br /> • 7.7 HYDRAULIC ELEVATOR RESULTS <br /> The laboratory analytical results indicate that no PCBs were detected in the product sample. Laboratory <br /> report sheets indicating analytical methods used, detection limits, and the results of the analysis are <br /> included in Appendix B. <br /> 8.0 HUMAN HEALTH SCREENING EVALUATION <br /> 8.1 GENERAL COMMENTS <br /> The purpose of this human health screening evaluation is to provide the DTSC Risk Manager with an <br /> estimate of the potential chronic health hazard from contamination at the site. The risk and hazard <br /> estimates are calculated for exposure pathways most frequently encountered at a residential setting. Due <br /> to the generic nature of these assumptions, the risk and hazard estimates are not absolute measures of risk <br /> or hazard at the site. This screening evaluation consists of a compilation of methods, models, and <br /> assumptions used by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and DTSC to <br /> quantify risk/hazard. The default exposure factors chosen for this evaluation are those recommended by <br /> the USEPA to represent a reasonable maximum exposure in a residential setting.-Using these default <br /> factors, this screening evaluation quantifies the potential lifetime risk and hazard from site conditions for <br /> a defined set of exposure pathways. Pathways of exposure evaluated by this method are: 1) inhalation of <br /> airborne dust from soils, 2) inhalation of VOCs from soil, 3) inhalation of VOCs from vapors, 4) <br /> incidental ingestion of soil, and 5) dermal absorption by direct contact with soil. Water pathways were <br /> not evaluated based on reasons stated in Section 4.2. Exposure point concentrations were taken as the <br /> highest concentrations of any contaminant in all soil and soil gas samples collected at the site. <br /> • <br /> ow <br /> 1 <br /> ILO CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.