My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAGNOLIA
>
510
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0521824
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2020 12:23:11 PM
Creation date
3/5/2020 10:27:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0521824
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0014819
FACILITY_NAME
CSU STANISLAUS / STKN MULTI-CAMPUS
STREET_NUMBER
510
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MAGNOLIA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
510 E MAGNOLIA ST
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• PreTiminary Environmental Assessment Report <br /> Pittman Elementary School,Stockton,CA <br /> December 10,2003 <br /> Page 22 <br /> • Table 16—Site Conce tual Model <br /> Source Media PathwayReceptors <br /> Pesticide Application soil in estion dermal abso tion residents <br /> dust in air inhalation residents <br /> Metals in Soil soil in estion dermal abso tion residents <br /> dust in air inhalation residents <br /> soil in-ti- dermal abso tion residents <br /> VOCs in Soil dust in air inhalation residents <br /> vapors inhalation residents <br /> SVOCs in Soil soil ingestion,dermal absorption residents <br /> dust in air inhalation residents <br /> F nncure Assessment Calculations <br /> The concentration in the exposure media used for the exposure assessment was the highest concentration <br /> detected at the site. As calculated in the spreadsheets included in Appendix C, the residential exposure <br /> scenario included a six-year exposure period for a child of highest soil ingestion [200 milligrams <br /> (mg)/day] per body weight [15 kilograms (kg)]. Additionally, a 24-year exposure duration was assessed <br /> for adults by using a soil ingestion.rate of 100 mg/day and an adult body weight of 70 kg. <br /> As shown in the calculations included in Appendix C, the DTSC PEA defaults for dermal surface area, <br /> adherence, exposure frequency, exposure duration, and dermal penetration were used in calculating <br /> dermal doses. For inhalation exposure to dusts, a dust-in-air concentration of 50 micrograms per cubic <br /> meter (µg/m3) was assumed (PEA Guidance Manual p. 2-25). The DTSC PEA default rate of 10 cubic <br /> • meters (m3)/day for a child and 20 m3/day for an adult were used as default inhalation rates (1999). <br /> Exposure analysis calculation methods are those of DTSC (1999) as performed using Microsoft Excel <br /> spreadsheets included in Appendix C. The exposure point concentration values chosen for the <br /> calculations are the highest concentrations of constituents detected in soil samples collected at the site as <br /> presented in the tables included in Appendix C. <br /> The Johnson and Ettinger Model for Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Into Buildings uses an averaging time of <br /> 70 years for carcinogens, an averaging time of 30 years for noncarcinogens, an exposure duration of 30 <br /> years, and an exposure frequency of 350 days per year. Exposure analysis calculation methods were <br /> performed using Microsoft Excel spreadsheets included in Appendix C. The media values chosen for the <br /> calculations are the highest concentrations of constituents detected in soil gas or groundwater samples <br /> collected at the site as presented in the tables included in Appendix C. The United States Soil <br /> Conservation Service Classification of soil at the site was determined for the site through particle size <br /> analysis of a soil sample from the site (Appendix Q. <br /> 8.2.3 Risk Assessment Methods <br /> TOTiCi y Assessment <br /> A toxicity and environmental fate profile was developed for all contaminants using the California Office <br /> of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) Cancer Potency Factors and the USEPA <br /> Integrated Risk Information System(IRIS). See toxicity data for detected constituents in Appendix C. <br /> Rick and Heard Characterization <br /> As summarized in Table 17, beryllium, cadmium, cobalt, nickel, hexavalent chromium, aldrin, alpha- <br /> BHC, beta-BHC, delta-BHC, gamma-BHC, alpha-chlordane, DDD, DDE, DDT, dieldrin, endosulfan II, <br /> ih1 CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.