Laserfiche WebLink
a 1, <br /> d <br /> I DAVID K. ROSS (BAR NO. 58167) <br /> 4633 Quail Lakes Drive <br /> 2 Stockton, California 95207 <br /> Telephone: (209)477-7677 1995 MR;2 3 P.'' 4' 2 <br /> 3 <br /> A. PETER RAUSCH, JR. (BAR NO. 127930) J EE P',LL aAFS, CLEL Fx' <br /> 4 MICHAEL A. FLUETSCH (BAR NO. 160895) <br /> LAW OFFICE OF A. PETER BAUSCH, JR. DT <br /> 5 2800 W. March Lane, Suite 220 <br /> Stockton, California 95219 <br /> 6 Telephone: (209) 952-5000 <br /> 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff, <br /> Leroy E. Francis <br /> 8 <br /> J 9 <br /> 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN JOAQ0& <br /> 12 LEROY E. FRANCIS, } CASE NO. 281855 <br /> 13 Plaintiff, } REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO ORDER <br /> 14 vs. } TO SHOVE' CAUSE RE: CONTEMPT <br /> DATE: March 27, 1995 <br /> 15 GEORGE ALEXANDER,individually and doing. ) TIME: 9:00 a.m. <br /> business as ALEXANDER'S KIWIFRUIT ) DEPT.: . 10 <br /> 16 PRODUCTS, et al., ) <br /> 17 Defendants. ) <br /> 18 ) <br /> 19 - -- <br /> 20 Alexander's Opposition fails to refute the charges of contempt, or to show any reason why this <br /> 21 Court should not modify the Preliminary-Injunctiori to enjoin him from entering the re4d property located <br /> 22 at 12470 Locke Road, Lockeford, California(the "Property"). Instead, Alexander complains about. <br /> 23 Francis and his attorneys. Alexander's complaints are unfounded and immaterial. <br /> 24 - What is abundantly clear, is that Alexander has blatantly ignored the authority of this Court's <br /> 25 orders by removing pffice furniture and equipment, and interfering with Francis' efforts to clean up <br /> s 26 environmental problems on the Property. <br /> 27 What is also clear, is that the balance of the hardships militates strongly in favor of modifying the <br /> 28 Preliminary Injunction.to immediately remove Alexander from the Property. The potential harm to <br /> 1 <br />