Laserfiche WebLink
16 August 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 01-0852 <br /> Page 7 of 7 <br /> encountered in the former distillation area, also contained low concentrations of toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene and total xylenes. Again, additional samples collected in the area did not contain <br /> detectable concentrations of hydrocarbons. AGE found no connection to any of the suspected <br /> contaminant sources or other evidence that the encountered hydrocarbons are likely to be part of a <br /> significant release in the area. <br /> All of the shallow soil samples collected in the areas of the two former cooling towers contained <br /> detectable concentrations of hexavalent chromium with concentrations ranging from 1.0 mg/kg to <br /> 9.8 mg/kg.Two samples collected from 5 feet bsg in each of the two areas did not contain detectable <br /> concentrations of hexavalent chromium. The available data suggests a widespread, shallow impact <br /> to soil in the areas of the two former cooling towers that does not appear to extend significantly into <br /> the subsurface. The detected distribution of hexavalent chromium is suggestive of deposition by <br /> wind-blown spray from the cooling towers impacting the shallow soil, The available data does not <br /> appear to indicate a significant subsurface release of the contaminant. The detected concentrations <br /> are below the federal EPA Preliminary Clean-up Goals (PBGs)of 30 mg/kg for residential soil and <br /> 64 mg/kg Tor industrial soil,but do.exceed the California-modified residential PRG of 0.2 mg/kg. <br /> As the site is not likely to be utilized_ for residential purposes,-it seems unlikely that the California- <br /> modified PRG would be applied to the site. . �k <br /> In response to an AGE inquiry, a representative of the California Department of Toxic Substances. <br /> I <br /> Control(DTSC)could not offer an.opinion of the DTSC's level of concern with the concentrations <br /> detected without careful review of the sampling methods, location, etc. Based on the assumptions <br /> of probable source localities, interpreted method of deposition, sample localities, and contaminant <br /> concentrations encountered,AGE believes that-the hexavalent chromium concentrations encountered <br /> in the'shallow soil samples are representative of the actual concentrations remaining in place and that X <br /> remediation and/or cleanup of the impicted soil is not likely to be required. <br /> 7.0. LIMITATIONS <br /> Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by <br /> environmental consultants practicing in this or similar fields. The findings were based mainly upon <br /> analytical results provided by an independent laboratory.Evaluation of the soil conditions at the site <br /> has been made from a limited.number of available data points (i.e. soil sampling points), and <br /> subsurface conditions may vary away from these data points. The absence of any potential gross <br /> contamination sources, historical.or present,- does not necessarily imply that the site is free of any <br /> contamination. This report only represents a"due diligence"effort as to the current environmental <br /> status of.the site. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to. the professional <br /> recommendations contained in this report. <br /> Advpnced GeoEnvironmental;Inc. <br />