Laserfiche WebLink
Geological recluucs11K Page 3 <br /> Groundwater Monaonng Report <br /> Project No 662 2 <br /> September 12,2001 <br /> ' The groundwater samples collected on August 3, 2001 were delivered to California <br /> Laboratory Services of Rancho Cordova, California (Department of Health Services <br /> ' Certification No 1233), for the following analyses <br /> • Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, and Xylene (BTEX) by EPA method 602 <br /> ' • Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline (TPH-G) by EPA method 5030/8015(M) <br /> • MTBE, DIPS, ETBE, TAME and TBA by EPA method 8260 <br /> ' The detection limits for the above analyses are listed in Table 2 of Appendix A while the lab <br /> analytical results are presented in Appendix B <br /> 1 <br /> 2.0 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION <br /> The results of the groundwater sample analysts show the following <br /> • Well MW-1 contained gasoline oxygenates MTBE and TAME at 2500 �tg/l and 13 µg/l, <br /> ' respectively <br /> • Well MW-3 contained gasoline oxygenates MTBE, ETBE and TAME at 6600, 9 0 and <br /> 24 µg/l, respectively <br /> • MW-2, which is upgradient of the former USTs, has not contained contaminant <br /> concentrations above the laboratory for the seven quarterly events completed thus far in <br /> the investigation <br /> • Neither BTEX nor TPH-G was present in any of the groundwater samples above the <br /> laboratory reporting limits <br /> ' . Oxidation-Reduction Potential measurements (Table 3) show that well MW-3 has a <br /> negative value This suggests that MW-3 is within the halo of reaction-depleted water <br /> caused by biodegradation of the contaminants The values for wells MW-1 and MW-2 <br /> ' are still positive, suggesting that there is a limited amount of biodegradation of the <br /> contaminant plume occurring This is to be expected, since the primary contaminant is <br /> MTBE, which is very resistant to biodegradation <br /> The lateral extent of the contamination is only defined upgradient to the northwest by MW- <br /> ' 2 The vertical extent has not been defined <br /> GTI makes the following recoimnendations <br /> • Perform plume definition and evaluate the mass of contaminants present by installing <br /> additional monitoring wells GTI proposes the installation of two additional monitoring <br /> wells, MW-4 and MW-5, in the locations indicated in Figure 4 Well MW-4 will be <br /> located in the predominant down gradient direction as shown in Figure 3 — <br /> Groundwater Gradient Rose Diagram Well MW-5 will be placed to the north of the <br /> site in the direction of the highest recorded groundwater gradient (a magnitude of 0 018 <br />