My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004569
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
290
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0507835
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004569
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2020 12:41:00 PM
Creation date
3/5/2020 11:36:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0004569
RECORD_ID
PR0507835
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007793
FACILITY_NAME
SUPER STOP MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
290
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22309101
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
290 N MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' eoln ca[ echnus 2nc Page 3 <br /> Groundwater Monrtonng Report <br /> Project No 662 2 <br /> March 20,2001 <br /> 1.3 Laboratory Analyses <br /> ' The groundwater samples collected on February 16, 2001 were delivered to Sherwood Labs <br /> (Department of Health Services Certification No 1400), of Hilmar, California, for analysis <br /> ' Sherwood analyzed the three monitoring well groundwater samples for <br /> • Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, and Xylene (BTEX) by EPA method 602 <br /> • Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline (TPH-G) by EPA method 503018015(M) <br /> Additional samples were sent to Entech Analytical Labs (Department of Health Services <br /> ' Certification No 2346) from Sherwood Labs for the analysis of <br /> • MTBE, DIPE, ETBE, TAME and TBA by EPA method 8260 <br /> ' The detection limits for the above analyses are listed in Table 2 of Appendix A while the lab <br /> analytical results are presented in Appendix B <br /> ' <br /> 20 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION <br /> The results of the groundwater sample analysts show the following <br /> • The laboratory results indicate MTBE continues to be present in wells MW-1 & MW-3 <br /> ' • MW-2, which is upgradient of the farmer U STs, remained free of detectable <br /> contamination for the fifth consecutive event <br /> • Neithei BTEX nor TPH-G was present in any of the groundwater samples above the <br /> laboratory reporting limits <br /> • Oxidation-Reduction Potential measurements (Table 3) show that the three wells at this <br /> site are not significantly impacted by biodegradation of a BTEX/TPH-G plume The <br /> values have decreased by an order of magnitude, but are still positive, suggesting that <br /> there is a limited amount of biodegradation of the contaminant plume occurring This is <br /> to be expected, since the primary contaminant is MTBE, which is very resistant to <br /> biodegradation <br /> The lateral extent of the contamination is only defined upgradient to the northwest by MW- <br /> 2 The vertical extent has not been defined <br /> GTI makes the following recommendations <br /> • Perform additional soil and groundwater investigation by installing borings and <br /> monitoring wells to define the lateral and vertical extent of the plume and to evaluate <br /> the mass of contaminants present In our January 15, 2001 work plan, GTI proposed <br /> the installation of seven direct push probes to achieve additional plume definition The <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.