|
CPT Interpretations
<br /> Table 2 References
<br /> No Reference
<br /> 1 Robertson,P K and Campanella, R G, 1986,"Guidelines for Use,Interpretation and Application of
<br /> the CPT and CPTU',UBC,Sod Mechanics Serres No 105,Cnnl Eng Dept,Vancouver,
<br /> B C,Canada
<br /> ' 2 _ Robertson,P K,Campanelia,R G,Gillespie, D and Greig,J,1986,"Use of Prexometei Cone
<br /> Data",Proceedings of InSitu 86,ASCE Specialty Conference Blacksburg,Virginia
<br /> 3�~ y Robertson,P K and Campanella, R G, 1989,'Guidelines for Geotechnical Design Using CPT an8
<br /> CPTU",UBC,Soil Mechanics Serres No 120,Civil Eng Dept Vancouver,8 C,Canada
<br /> 4 Robertson,P K, 1990,'§&i Class cation Using the Cone Penetration Test",Canadian Geotechnrcal
<br /> Journal Volume 27
<br /> ' S Robertson P K.and Fear,C E, 1995,"Liquefaction of Sands and its Evaluation",Keynote Lecture,
<br /> First International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering,Tokyo,Japan
<br /> B Gregg In Situ—inter—nail F2eport— � � F N w `„Y J
<br /> 7 Robertson, P K and Wnde, C E-1 1997,"Cyclic Liquefaction and its Evaluation Based on SPT and
<br /> CPT',NCEER Workshop Paper,January 22, 1997
<br /> ' 8 Wnde,C E and Robertson, P K, 1997, "Phase 11 Data Review Report(Massey and Kidd Sites,
<br /> Fraser River Delta)", Volume 1 -Data Report(June 1997),University of Alberta
<br /> 9 Plewes, H D,Davies,M F and Jeffene's W-6—, 1§921- "CPT Based Screening Procedure for
<br /> Evaluating Liquefaction Susceptibility",45th Canadian Geotechnical Conference,Toronto,
<br /> Ontario,-October-1 992 r V w
<br /> 1
<br /> i
<br /> S
<br /> EGG
<br /> 1
<br />
|