Laserfiche WebLink
Each well was purged before collecting water samples Purging <br /> was completed only after water temperature, pH, and conductivity <br /> had stabilized Purged water was contained in a labeled, secured <br /> 55 gallon drum on site <br /> The wells were allowed to recover after purging A water sample <br /> was then collected with a fresh bailer Each sample was divided <br /> among three 40-m1 VOA vials The vials are supplied pre-cleaned <br /> to exact EPA protocols and contain the appropriate preservative <br /> The sample vials were labeled as to station, well, time, and <br /> sampler, and documented on the chain-of-custody sheet, they were <br /> then placed into an ice chest and cooled to 40C with ice The <br /> samples were delivered to a California State Certified <br /> Laboratory and signed over to the lab using standard chain-of- <br /> custody procedures Field notes describing the collection of <br /> water samples are included in Appendix A <br /> Chemical Analysis Results <br /> The water samples were analyzed at Anlab Analytical Laboratory <br /> (DHS #1468) for Total Fuel Hydrocarbons (gasoline) with BTEX <br /> distinction, utilizing EPA Methods 5030 and 602 , respectively <br /> The analytical results from the water samples (MW1, MW5 , MW6 and <br /> MW7) were all, Below Reportable Limits (BRL) MW2 , MW4 and MW8 <br /> indicated a level of TFH of 046 mg/L, 4 9 mg/L and 6 mg/L <br /> respectively Benzene concentrations are 340 and 55 kcg/L for MW4 <br /> and MW8 respectively MW2 does not contain BTEX compounds above <br /> action levels <br /> The current localized impact of TFH-gasoline and benzene on <br /> ground water is depicted in Figures 5C and 6C The analytical <br /> results and pertinent reference data are listed in Table 1 <br /> Anlab' s laboratory report is included as Appendix B <br /> DISCUSSION OF RESULTS <br /> The ground water data obtained during the current monitoring <br /> round show significant changes since the last quarterly <br /> monitoring report Ground water flow direction is to the south- <br /> southeast with an average gradient of 0 002 feet per linear foot <br /> Ground water at the site is currently in a discharge cycle <br /> Previous discharge and recharge cycles at the site have produced <br /> sporadic traces of TFH or BTEX constituents in some of the <br /> monitoring wells The ' spotty' occurrence of contamination in <br /> MW4 does not appear to be solely related to depths of the aquifer <br /> but are probably representing a localized ground water flow from <br /> stratigraphy not recognized from well to well at the site <br /> Currently, there are slight levels of dissolved petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon constituents in MW2 <br /> 4 <br />