Laserfiche WebLink
Geological Tectmics Inc. Page 4 <br /> Soil Vapor Extraction <br /> Pilot Test Work Plan <br /> Project No. 770.2 <br /> September 17,2003 <br /> permeable soil layers causing lateral dispersion higher in the column. Well MW-6 has <br /> contained detectable groundwater contamination but no soil impacts in the overlying or <br /> underlying soil. This implies that there is a fluctuating water table smear zone radiating out <br /> from the release area. <br /> In Figure 6, a similar situation is present. The contaminated soil column under the UST <br /> excavation/dispenser area appears to extend toward MW-5 @ 34 feet bgs. Well MW-8 was <br /> non-detect for the June 18, 2003 event and the groundwater plume does not appear to <br /> extend this far to the northwest based on this fifth consecutive sampling event. The <br /> groundwater plume appears to extend to the location of MW-104 where soil contamination <br /> (1300 mg/kg) was detected at the top of the historical groundwater table range. Soils below <br /> this depth were clean and MW-104 is non-detect with a screened interval approximately 29 <br /> feet below the water table. <br /> The field geologist noted a strong HC odor at 40 feet bgs and a free product interface at <br /> 45.5 feet bgs during the installation of boring MW-7. The soil concentration of 9,72,WA--'r m <br /> mg/kg TPH-D @ 45 feet bgs does correlate with the free product noted at this depth. It is <br /> likely that the geologist had encountered non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs) entrained in <br /> the silty soil. In soil at 55 feet, 12,200 mg/kg TPH-D was detected, which attenuated to 331 <br /> mg/kg at 70 feet bgs. Once reaching the groundwater table the diesel contamination spread <br /> laterally with the rise and fall of the groundwater table. It has attenuated with travel below <br /> the water table to at least the depth of the screened intervals of MW-1 and MW-105. <br /> Figure 9 illustrates the shallow aquifer TPH-D concentrations for the June 18, 2003 event. <br /> V <br /> 3.0 SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION TEST <br /> The site presents challenges for the selection of a clean up alternative. Assuming an <br /> approximate depth of 15 feet bgs for the bottom of the former UST excavation, a vertical <br /> column of 48 feet of impacted soil remains above the water table at 63 feet bgs. Soil layers <br /> of variable penneability are present to inhibit the vertical migration of diesel fuel and cause <br /> lateral migration or pooling of the contaminant. This case is demonstrated in the apparent <br /> NAPL present at 45 feet bgs in MW-7 where a fine to coarse-grained sand unit lies above a <br /> silt unit. Removing the contamination from this highly permeable zone would be relatively <br /> easy using soil vapor extraction (SVE) if the contaminant were gasoline. However, diesel <br /> fuel is much less volatile than gasoline and the only BTEX component present above <br /> laboratory detection limits is xylene. <br /> GTI proposes to perform a soil vapor extraction pilot test utilizing higher vacuum pressures <br /> (up to 26" Hg vacuum) than used with standard SVE. This is similar to dual phase <br />