Laserfiche WebLink
cie0bgkiITecknus Inc Page 5 <br /> Groundwater Monitonng Report <br /> Project No 770 2 <br /> March 31,2004 <br /> ' 1,3 Laboratory Analyses ' <br /> ' The groundwater samples collected on December 16, 2003, were delivered to Sherwood <br /> Lab (Department of Health Services Certification No 1400), of Hilmar, California, for <br /> analysis <br /> ' Sherwood analyzed the seven monitoring g well groundwater samples for <br /> • Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, and Xylene (BTEX)by EPA method 8020 <br /> • Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline (TPH-G) by EPA method 5030/8015(M) <br /> • TEPH- Diesel and Motor Oil by EPA method 3500/8100(M) <br /> The detection limits for the above analyses are listed in Table,3' of Appendix A while the <br /> laboratory analytical results are presented in Appendix B <br /> As required under AB2886, the groundwater elevation and laboratory data were submitted <br /> electronically to GeoTracker on January 29 and March 30 - confirmation numbers <br /> 2307700276 & 2984745621. <br /> 2.0 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION <br /> e The results of the groundwater sample analysis indicate the following <br /> • The reversal of groundwater direction by 180° in the deeper aquifer for the April and <br /> May 2003 sounding events is anomalous to the historical data The deeper aquifer has <br /> ' been monitored by three wells (MW-104, MW-105 and MW-106) since June 2002 and <br /> the other events all displayed an easterly trend to groundwater direction It is noted that <br /> the gradients for these two events were higher than normal suggesting that off site <br /> ' production is influencing the aquifer A well receptor survey was completed for the site <br /> in January 2001 and two agricultural wells were identified approximately 1600 feet west <br /> of the site (see Map 1, Table 1 — Appendix D) If these wells were operated during the <br /> ' months in question, it is possible that the Marci site was within the cone of depression <br /> created by the well pumping The shallow aquifer did not reverse during this period and <br /> this may be due to the domestic wells to the southeast of the site that may be screened <br /> ' shalIower than the agricultural wells and exert a primary influence on the water table <br /> that is easterly <br /> • Diesel range petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in five of the site's eleven <br /> monitoring wells <br /> • Well MW-5 contained 4,820 Fig/1 diesel and remains the most severely impacted well <br />' The reversal in groundwater direction discussed above may be the reason that the core <br /> plume is displaced from the location of the former UST <br />