Laserfiche WebLink
GeologuaLTeelaucs 1AC Page 5 <br /> ' Groundwater Mozutonng Report <br /> Project No 770 2 <br /> March 16,2006 <br /> ' 2.0 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION <br /> The results of the groundwater monitoring event indicate the following <br /> ' • The deeper aquifer has been monitored by three wells (MW-104, MW-105 and MW-106) <br /> since June 2002 and has displayed an easterly trend to groundwater direction The <br /> reversal of groundwater direction by 180° in the deeper aquifer for the April and May <br /> 2003 sounding events is anomalous to the historical data It is noted that the gradients for <br /> these two events were higher than normal suggesting that off site production is <br /> ' influencing the aquifer A receptor well survey was completed for the site in January <br /> 2001 and two agricultural wells were identified approximately 1600 feet west of the site <br /> If these wells were operated during the months in question, it is possible that the Marci <br /> ' site was within the cone of depression created by the well pumping The shallow aquifer <br /> did not reverse during this period and this may be due to the domestic wells to the <br /> southeast of the site that may be screened shallower than the agricultural wells and exert a <br /> ' primary influence on the water table that is easterly <br /> • Diesel range petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in four of the site's eleven <br /> monitoring wells sampled this quarter <br /> M • Well MW-5 contained 30,000 µg/1 diesel and remains the most severely impacted well <br /> This well also contained 1000 ug/1 TPH-G, 7 ug/l ethylbenzene and 14 ug/l xylenes <br /> • Well MW-1 contained 150 q.g/1 diesel This well intermittently contains diesel <br /> • Well MW-4 contained 880 [tg/l diesel This well consistently contains diesel <br /> • Well MW-7 contained 1400 ug/l TPH-D This well consistently contains diesel <br /> ' • Deep wells MW-104, MW-105 and MW-106 did not contain contaminant concentrations <br /> above the laboratory reporting limits <br /> • Oxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) measurements show moderately positive and <br /> ' negative ORP values in the monitoring wells (four wells did not recover adequately from <br /> purging to record valid data) Wells' MW-1, MW-4 and MW-105 negative values <br /> indicate that the wells are within the halo of reaction depleted water caused by <br /> ' biodegradation The ORP data are included in Table 5 of Appendix A <br /> • The vertical extent of the plume is intermittently defined by MW-104, 105, & 106 The <br /> groundwater near these wells appears not to be contaminated <br /> Well MW-5 <br /> An examination of the contaminant distribution and groundwater flow direction data reveals <br /> ' groundwater elevation is slowly declining since 2000 and that diesel concentrations were <br /> fairly stable But three spikes are present in the last two years that suggest an increasing trend <br /> in this well (see Figure 6- MW-5 TPH-D vs Groundwater Elevation) A consistent factor <br /> ' previously noted in the investigation was the fluctuation in diesel concentrations in well <br /> MW-5 The concentrations had demonstrated a slight increasing trend until June 2002 when <br /> concentrations began to fluctuate for about a year Subsequently, the concentrations were <br />