My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003869
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOOMIS
>
2969
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545428
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003869
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2020 7:17:35 PM
Creation date
3/9/2020 10:43:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003869
RECORD_ID
PR0545428
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005487
FACILITY_NAME
MARCIS DIESEL SERVICE
STREET_NUMBER
2969
STREET_NAME
LOOMIS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2969 LOOMIS RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cieologccal recknics lnc Page 5 <br /> ' Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 770 2 <br /> •} April 25,2005 <br /> 2.0 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION <br /> ' The results of the groundwater monitoring event indicate the following <br /> + The reversal of groundwater direction by 180'in the deeper aquifer for the April and May <br /> 2003 sounding events is anomalous to the historical data The deeper aquifer has been <br /> ' monitored by three wells (MW-104, MW-105 and MW-106) since June 2002 and the <br /> other events all displayed an easterly trend to groundwater direction It is noted that the <br /> gradients for these two events were higher than normal suggesting that off site production <br /> is influencing the aquifer A receptor well survey was completed for the site in January <br /> 2001 and two agricultural wells were identified approximately 1600 feet west of the site <br /> (see Map 1, Table 1 — Appendix D) If these wells were operated during the months in <br /> question, it is possible that the Marci site was within the cone of depression created by <br /> the well pumping The shallow aquifer did not reverse during this period and this may be <br /> due to the domestic wells to the southeast of the site that may be screened shallower than <br /> ' the agricultural wells and exert a primary influence on the water table that is easterly <br /> • Diesel range petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in two of the site's ten (out of eleven) <br /> monitoring wells sampled this quarter <br /> • Well MW-5 contained 14,000 µg/1 diesel Well MW-5 remains the most severely <br /> impacted well <br /> • Well MW-4 also experienced a marked increase in diesel concentrations since the June <br /> 2004 event (from 496 to 3400 µg/1 TPH-D) <br /> • Trace amount of benzene is present in MW-4 (0 61 µg/1) and MW-6 (0 5 µg/1) for this <br /> monitoring event Similar trace concentrations have also been detected in these wells <br /> historically <br /> • Deep wells MW-104, MW-105 and MW-106 did not contain contaminant concentrations <br /> ' above the laboratory reporting limits <br /> • Oxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) measurements show moderately positive ORP <br /> values in all the monitoring wells The ORP data are included in Table 5 of Appendix A <br /> • The vertical extent of the plume is intermittently defined by MW-104, 105, & 106 The <br /> groundwater near these wells appears not to be contaminated <br /> MW-5 <br /> An examination of the contaminant distribution and groundwater flow direction data reveals <br /> groundwater elevation is slowly declining since 2000 and that diesel concentrations are <br /> overall fairly stable, except for the August 2004 monitoring event A consistent factor <br /> previously noted in the investigation was the fluctuation in diesel concentrations in well <br /> ' MW-5 (see Figure 6- MW-5 TPH-D vs Groundwater Elevation) The concentrations had <br /> previously demonstrated a slight increasing trend until June 2002 when concentrations began <br /> to fluctuate for about a year Subsequently, the concentrations have been very consistent, <br /> except for August 2004 The cause for the very high spike in August is unclear, possibly due <br /> to low water level in the well and associated poor recharge to the well during purging and <br /> sampling Purging and sampling logs suggest that sample quality may be compromised due <br /> 1 � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.