Laserfiche WebLink
Wm. J. Hunter & Associate ; . 2220 Loma Vista Dr. <br /> Registered Geologists T I J Sacramento, CA 95825 <br /> Petroleum& Mineral Appraisers (916) 972-7941 <br /> r _- P,; ? FAX (916) 972-1683 <br /> March 30 , 1994 <br /> Linda Turkatte, REHS <br /> San Joaquin Co. PHS <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> 445 No. San Joaquin Street <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> Ref : 2969 Loomis Road (Site Code 2015; ) Quarterly Report, <br /> monitoring well data <br /> Dear Ms. Turkatte; <br /> We have enclosed a copy of the field log, chain of custody form, <br /> and laboratory analysis of a water sample taken from MW #1 on <br /> January 31 , 1994 . Water level measurements were taken in all <br /> three wells as directed by your office, but water samples were / <br /> not collected from MW 02 or #3. The results of that anlysis �r <br /> shows that Benzene was detected at 0 . 75 ug/L, and TPH-D was <br /> measured at 0 . 21 mg/L; Ethylbenzene, Toluene, and Xylene were not <br /> recorded at a detection limit of 0 . 3 ug/L. The sample taken in <br /> September, 1993 showed only Benzene at 0 . 9 ug/L; in June the <br /> results were 2. 7 ug/L Benzene, 27 . 0 ug/L Xylene, and 3 . 0 mg/L of <br /> TPHG. Refer to TABLE 1 for a summary of water analyzes run to <br /> �..r <br /> date. <br /> A review of the water level measurements taken since monitoring <br /> began in April , 1992, reveals that the maximum fluctuation in <br /> depths, (MW-2 , ) is 4 . 44' , with an average for the three wells of <br /> 4 . 25' . The highest levels recorded were in April, 1992 , with the <br /> lowest measured in September, 1992 . The graph prepared by Del- <br /> Tech included in this report shows that there is a good corre- <br /> lation in changes in water levels in the three wells. Although <br /> the rate of recharge varies slightly between the three, they <br /> appear to be communication with each other_ <br /> We have also included an updated exhibit showing the directions <br /> of hydraulic gradients as indicated by the 17 water level <br /> measurements taken to date. They are labeled on the attached <br /> EXHIBIT A. The data continues to show that the direction of flow <br /> is not stable; it has been measured to date in a 360-degree <br /> radius with no consistent established pattern. About half of the <br /> measurements show a northerly direction, and about half to the <br /> south. <br /> An analysis of all of the data obtained to date indicates that <br /> either: ( 1 ) there are no withdrawal or injection points within <br /> the zone of influence, and that the variations in direction are <br /> 1 <br />