Laserfiche WebLink
Fourth Quarter 2004 Monitoring Report OCT 2 9 2004 <br /> Quik Stop Market No 121 <br /> Page 2 E16 'ir-,QTH <br /> PENN C/ ERVICES <br /> Sampling Protocol (Appendix A) The groundwater purged from each well and equipment rinse <br /> water were placed in a 55-gallon drum and left at the site A summary of the groundwater purge <br /> data is presented in Table I <br /> Groundwater Sampling <br /> As previously mentioned, CCI sampled 7 of the 13 wells for the quarterly sample round <br /> Monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-5, MW-7 and MW-8 were all found to be dry this <br /> quarter Prior to sampling, CCI measured the depth-to-groundwater using an electronic sounding <br /> tape and field-checked the wells for the presence of free-floating product by collecting a sample <br /> in a clear acrylic bailer Free-floating product was not observed Each well was purged of <br /> stagnant water prior to the collection of a sample Dissolved oxygen measurements were not <br /> taken this quarter due to the low water table at the site Normal field measurements, including <br /> pH, conductivity, and water temperature, were periodically recorded during the purging process <br /> A sample was collected when these parameters stabilized to within 10% of each other After the <br /> groundwater was purged from each well, the groundwater samples were (a) collected with a <br /> clean disposable bailer, (b) transferred to appropriate laboratory-supplied bottles, (c) labeled, (d) <br /> logged on a chain-of-custody form, and (e) placed in a chilled ice chest for transportation to a <br /> state-certified laboratory Monitoring well purge data are summarized in Table I <br /> Laboratory Analysis <br /> The groundwater samples were submitted to Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc (STL), a state- <br /> certified laboratory located in Pleasanton, California, for chemical analysis The laboratory <br /> employed methods approved by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> (CRWQCB) and the EPA The groundwater samples were analyzed for total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as gasoline(TPHg) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX), <br /> using EPA Test Method 8015M/8021 and for fuel oxygenates, including methyl tertiary butyl <br /> ether (MTBE), using EPA Test Method 8260B <br /> Summary of Laboratory Results <br /> All seven wells sampled this quarter were reported to be free of TPHg and BTEX compounds <br /> Only one of the six (A-aquifer) shallow groundwater monitoring wells was found to be impacted <br /> with MTBE Monitoring wells MW-4, MW-11 and MW-12 were all reported to be free of <br /> detectable TPHg/BTEX and fuel oxygenates this quarter (Figure 2) <br /> Well RW-1, located in the center of the property, was reported to be free of detectable TPHg and <br /> BTEX compounds MTBE was detected at a concentration of 37ug/L No other fuel oxygenates <br /> were detected in any of the other monitoring wells <br />