Laserfiche WebLink
• Quik Stop Market No 121 <br /> CCI Project No 12118-2 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Groundwater Sampling <br /> On April 18, 2001, CCI sampled all nine wells for the quarterly sample round Before <br /> groundwater sampling, CCI measured the depth to groundwater using an electronic sounding <br /> tape and field-checked the wells for the presence of free-floating product by collecting a sample <br /> in a clear acrylic bailer Free-floating product was not observed Each well was purged of <br /> stagnant water prior to the collection of a sample Normal field measurements, including pH, <br /> conductivity, and water temperature, were periodically recorded during the purging process A <br /> sample was collected when these parameters stabilized to within 10% of each other At least <br /> three well casing volumes of groundwater were purged from each well before sampling <br /> Samples were (a) collected with a clean disposable bailer, (b) transferred to appropriate <br /> laboratory-supplied bottles, ( c) labeled, (d) logged on a chain-of-custody form, and (e) placed in <br /> a chilled ice chest for transportation to a state-certified laboratory Monitoring well purge data is <br /> summarized in data Table 1 <br /> Laboratory Analysis <br /> The groundwater samples were submitted to North State Environmental (North State), a state- <br /> certified laboratory located in South San Francisco, California, for chemical analysis The <br /> laboratory employed methods approved by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> (CRWQCB) and the EPA The groundwater samples were analyzed for total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) <br /> and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), using EPA Test Method 8015 and 8020 MTBE <br /> concentrations were confirmed using EPA Test Method 8260 <br /> Summary of Laboratory Results <br /> The seven groundwater monitoring wells (screened from approximately 9 to 24 feet) were <br /> sampled and found to be impacted with petroleum hydrocarbons and MTBE Monitoring well <br /> MW-1, located on the northwest side of the site (Figure 2), near the intersection of Union Road <br /> and West Louise Avenue, was reported to contain TPHg at a concentration of 170 micrograms <br /> per liter(ug/1), benzene at 2 ug/l and MTBE at 13,000 ug/l Monitoring well MW-2, also located <br /> on the north side of the site, was reported to have 81 ug/l TPHg, benzene at 2 ug/l and MTBE at <br /> 29 ug/l Monitoring well MW-3, located on the southeast side of the property, was reported to <br /> contain 460 ug/l TPHg and benzene at I 1 ug/l This well was reported to have MTBE at a <br /> concentration of 98,000 ug/l Recovery well RW-1, located near the east side of the fuel tanks, <br /> was also reported to contain 560 ug/l TPHg, 6 ug/l benzene and 180,000 ug/l MTBE <br /> Monitoring well MW-4, screened from 33 to 43 feet, was reported to contain 86 ug/l TPHg and <br /> • 1,200 ug/l MTBE Monitoring wells MW-5, located on the southwest side of the site, and MW- <br />