Laserfiche WebLink
40 Workrng to Restore Nature <br /> The hydhydrocarbons detected duringthat sampling may have due to contaminated <br /> equipment <br /> In November 1987, the tank cavity was over-excavated to 28 feet below grade in an effort <br /> to remove soil affected by hydrocarbons Analytical results of soil samples collected from <br /> • the base of the excavation indicated that relatively low concentrations of gasoline <br /> hydrocarbons (0 20 ppm) ethylbenzene, 0 20 ppm toluene, 3 25 ppm xylene) were detected <br /> in only one sample, which was collected nearest to well BH-1/ MW-1 <br /> In July 1993, RESNA observed the drilling of three soil borings and installation of three <br /> • monitoring wells (MW-2 through MW-4) in the three borings Results of analyses of soil <br /> and water samples indicated that hydrocarbon concentrations were below laboratory <br /> detection limits <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING, FIRST QUARTER 1994 <br /> • <br /> On November 23 and December 17, 1993 and January 14, 1994, a technician from RESNA <br /> measured the depth to water and performed subjective analyses of groundwater samples <br /> collected from the four monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-4) The technician noted no <br /> floating product or sheen in the four wells (Table 1) On January 14, groundwater samples <br /> were collected for laboratory analyses. Our field procedures are described in an attachment <br /> 00 to this report <br /> The wellhead elevations of the monitoring wells at the site were surveyed by Tom O <br /> Morrow, Inc of West Sacramento California, a licensed land surveyor (California Land <br /> Surveyors No 3275) The surveyed elevations and the depth-to-groundwater measurements, <br /> 0 summarized in Table 1, were used to evaluate the potentiometric surface beneath the site <br /> The groundwater flow direction during the three monitoring events was to the east to <br /> southeast with hydraulic gradients ranging from 0 001 to 0 004 (Plates 3, 4, and 5) <br /> The water samples were analyzed for TPHg using modified Environmental Protection <br /> • Agency (EPA) Method 8015 and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xvlene isomers <br /> (BTEX) using EPA Method 602 The samples were analyzed at Sequoia Analytical in <br /> Sacramento,California(Hazardous Waste Testing Laboratory Certificate No 1624) Results <br /> of analyses indicated TPHg and BTEX concentrations were below laboratory detection <br /> limits The results of analyses are summarized in Table 1 Concentrations of TPHg and <br /> benzene are shown on Plate 2 Copies of the laboratory Analysis Reports and Chain of <br /> Custody Record are attached <br /> • <br /> 0201giak/123009-1 2 <br /> 0 <br />