Laserfiche WebLink
FIRST QUARTER, 1997 <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT <br /> ' FORMER DIAMOND LUMBER - MANTECA <br /> APRIL, 1997 <br /> ' 2.2 Monitoring Well Purging <br /> Each sampled well was purged using a submersible pump until at least three equivalent well <br /> ' volumes of water had been removed and pH, temperature and conductivity measurements had <br /> stabilized. All purging and sampling equipment was washed in a trisodium phosphate solution and <br /> rinsed in distilled water prior to each usage to reduce the potential for cross contamination <br /> between wells. The pH, temperature and conductivity measurements were recorded on field data <br /> sheets, which are kept in a permanent project file. The wells were allowed to stand for a period of <br /> ' time to equilibrate prior to sampling. Groundwater purged from the wells was placed into DOT <br /> approved 55-gallon drums. The purge water will be disposed of by pumping into a vacuum truck <br /> and sending it to a recycling facility. <br /> ' 2.3 Groundwater Sampling <br /> ' Proper sample collection and handling are essential to assure quality data obtained from a sample. <br /> Each groundwater sample, therefore, was collected using a new disposable bailer for each well <br /> and placed in the appropriate laboratory prepared containers, using proper protocol. The samples <br /> were labeled with the date, time, identifying well number, placed into a cooler at 4° C, and <br /> transported to the laboratory under continuous chain-of-custody (COC) documentation. The <br /> laboratory reports and COC documentation are included in Appendix B. <br /> 2.4 Groundwater Analyses <br /> ' Analyses of the sampled groundwater was performed by Sierra Laboratories,Inc. (Sierra), a <br /> California certified laboratory. Samples were analyzed in accordance with state guidelines and <br /> EPA protocols. <br /> ' 3.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> 3.1 Results of Groundwater Laboratory Analyses <br /> ' TPH G was reported in four of the eight sampled wells. TPH G was reported at concentrations <br /> ranging from non-detect in SRK-MW1, SPK-MW3, MW-7-P, and MW-S-P to 22,000 <br /> ' micrograms per liter 0.cg/l) in BEI-MW3. Benzene was reported in all wells sampled this quarter <br /> at concentrations ranging from 1.0 Ag/l in SRK-MW3 to 2,500 ,ugA in BEI-MW3. Both off-site <br /> wells were non-detect (ND) for TPH, and low to ND for BTEX constituents. The laboratory <br /> ' results for this sampling event are presented on Figure 3, and in Table 2. <br />