Laserfiche WebLink
' TABLE 2 <br /> GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL DATA <br /> . FORMER DIAMOND LUMBER SITE <br /> MANTECA,CALIFORNIA <br /> 1 WOU N6 wto 'Vola€ o, woe- Tp1uone 1 t1t 11 z 3e X)ilm Lead <br /> (UWL.f�y€#raoar�t� <br /> ) (u ) (U91P <Ugp (u ) <br /> SRK-MWI 12/1389 Ni NI N1 NI NI NI <br /> 10/15/91 Ni NI NI NI NI NI <br /> 12/24/91 ND(50) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) 18 <br /> 04/06/92 ND(50) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) 26 <br /> 08/31/92 ND(20) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) 48 <br /> ' 02/05/93 ND(20) 08 08 06 16 3 <br /> 06/00/93 ND(20) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) 28 <br /> 11/00/93 ND(20) ND(0 5) 3 05 2 17 <br /> 03/14/95 ND(50) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(50) <br /> 06/30/95 ND(50) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(2) <br /> 09/22/95 ND(50) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(1) <br /> SRK-MW2 12/13/89 NI NI NI NI NI NI <br /> 10/15/91 NI NI NI NI NI NI <br /> 12/24/91 ND(50) 16 ND(0 5) ND(0 5) 090 350 <br /> 04/06/92 1,800 220 ND(0 5) ND(0 5) 120 57 <br /> 08/31/92 100 2 ND(0 5) 08 06 100 <br /> 02/05/93 30 ND(0 3) ND(0 3) ND(0 3) ND(0 3) 36 <br /> 06/00/93 310 39 15 28 22 30 <br /> 11/00/93 60 1 4 1 4 15 <br /> 03/14/95 ND(50) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(50) <br /> 06/30/95 4,400 230 ND(0 5) 100 430 ND(2) <br /> ' 09/22/95 65 1 1 ND(0 5) ND(0 5) 076 ND(l) <br /> ' <br /> IRK-MW3 12/1389 NI NI NI NI NI Ni <br /> 10/15/91 Ni NI NI NI NI NI <br /> 12/24/91 ND(50) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) 24 <br /> 04/06/92 ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) 27 <br /> ' 08/31/92 ND(20) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) 14 <br /> 02/05/93 ND(20) 10 12 09 20 3 <br /> 06/00/93 290 40 15 28 22 18 <br /> ' 11/00/93 10 ND(0 5) 2 ND(0 5) 1 17 <br /> 03/14/95 ND(50) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(50) <br /> 06/30/95 ND(50) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(2) <br /> 09/22/95 ND(50) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(0 5) ND(1) <br /> uglL Micrograms per liter <br /> NI No sample collected,monitoring well had not been installed yet <br /> NS Not sampled <br /> ' (} Detection lmut <br /> * Analytical results for BEI-MW-1 and BEI-MW-3 for the 12/1389 sampling have been switched There appears to have been an <br /> error m the designation of the wells during the initial samphig <br /> i 1 <br />