Laserfiche WebLink
T <br /> ' Dtamond Lumber Manteca Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Page 4 <br /> The static water level elevations collected February 5, 1993, were on the average 4 feet higher than <br /> the previous sampling event (August 1992) but are comparable to the levels recorded during early <br /> 1992, during the April monitoring event SRK contacted the Western Regional Climate Center to <br /> ' obtain precipitation data for the Manteca area Precipitation data was obtained from the nearest <br /> station (Stockton, California), located approximately 13 miles north of the site A copy of this <br /> information gathered from 1985 through 1992, is provided in Appendix A- The SRK series monitoring <br /> wells were installed during November 1991 under the direct guidance of the PHS/EHD A review of <br /> available precipitation data indicates that this area was experiencing a drought which started in 1988 <br /> ' and began to abate in 1991 The BEI series monitoring wells were installed during August 1989 No <br /> precipitation was recorded during this month which typically is one of the driest months The SRK <br /> ' series monitoring wells were installed in November 1991 when 0 34 inches of precipitation was <br /> recorded Pre-1988 precipitation levels for November were between 1 and 2 inches By comparing <br /> monthly precipitation data in Appendix A with static water Ievel information in Table 1, it can be <br /> deduced that static water levels are influenced by seasonal precipitation patterns <br /> An estimate of the groundwater gradient was made by using the most recent static water elevations to <br /> complete an orthographic construction known as a 3-point problem (Davis, G H , 1984, Structural <br /> Geology of Rocks and Regions John Wiley & Sons, PP 210) Solving a 3-point problem requires <br /> elevation control for at least three points that lie on a common plane, in this case the groundwater <br /> surface The elevation control was obtained by subtracting the static water levels (measured from the <br /> top of well casings) from the elevations of the well heads (referenced to the USGS Bench-Mark D-83, <br /> Brass Cap on top step of Legion Hall, South side of Yosemite Avenue Elevation 38 051 feet) It <br /> should be noted that the groundwater elevations varied by only a few tenths of feet Based an <br /> calculations using data during the February sampling event, the groundwater has a very slight gradient <br /> in a northerly direction It should be noted that the groundwater gradient is extremely flat (the <br /> difference in static groundwater elevations between the highest and lowest point, 150 feet laterally is <br /> ' approximately 0 2 feet Copies of the hand calculations and cross-sections used in determining the <br /> groundwater gradient are provided in Appendix B <br /> SRK contacted Mr Jim Podesta with the Manteca Public Works Department regarding subsurface <br /> groundwater information from private, municipal and irrigation wells located within 2,000 feet of the <br /> I site Mr Podesta cited the Spring 1992 Semi-Annual Groundwater Report, produced by the San <br /> Joaquin County Floor Control and Water Conservation District This document contains groundwater <br /> contour maps which include the Diamond Lumber facility Mr Podesta reviewed the relevant maps <br /> 1 contained in the Spring 1992 Semi-Annual Groundwater Report, and stated that the groundwater is <br /> in a northerly direction <br /> 4 0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING <br /> Approximately five casing volumes were purged from each of the three SRK monitoring wells (SRK- <br /> MW1,SRK-MW2 and SRK-MW3) using a 4-inch submersible pump and braided PVC tubing Purging <br /> causes a localized cone of depression around each monitoring well In essence, the cone of depression <br /> ' causes a localized drop in the static water level Special care was taken to keep the exterior of the <br /> Steffen Robertson and Kirsten <br />