My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004669
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
151
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545482
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004669
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2020 1:12:30 PM
Creation date
3/10/2020 9:08:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0004669
RECORD_ID
PR0545482
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005075
FACILITY_NAME
DONS MOBILE GLASS
STREET_NUMBER
151
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
953365719
APN
21941015
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
151 S MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATC Associates, Inc Project No 99975 7501 <br /> 1 <br /> ' 4.0 REMEDIATION STATUS AND EFFECTIVENESS REPORT <br /> Soil vapor extraction(SVE)and groundwater extraction at the site began on February 10, 1994 <br /> Since that time, through January 1999 more than 4 million gallons of groundwater and 30 <br /> million cubic feet of soil vapor have been extracted from four soil vapor and groundwater co- <br /> extraction wells at the site. Prior to discharge to the atmosphere and surface,the soil vapor and <br /> groundwater are treated through 2,000-pound vapor phase and aqueous phase carbon units, <br /> respectively A log of groundwater production is presented in Table 4 and the groundwater <br /> influent and effluent analyses are presented in Table 5 Table 6 is a log of the production and <br /> ' analysis of extracted soil vapor <br /> The data which are most significant for assessing the progress of the remediation program are <br /> ' the groundwater monitoring results presented in Table 2 and Table 7 For the four most severely <br /> impacted monitoring wells, Table 7 presents a comparison of the average TPHg and benzene <br /> concentrations for samples collected during the three monitoring events prior to the startup of <br /> ' the remediation program (in February 1998) with the average results for the three most recent <br /> monitoring events These results near show total elimination of total hydrocarbons in most of <br /> ' the previously impacted monitoring wells, and reductions of 76-95 percent in the severely <br /> impacted monitoring wells BEI-MW3 and BEI-MW 1 Reductions of benzene in these wells are <br /> more than 92 percent and 95 percent, respectively <br /> A significant observation,regarding the remediation process is the considerable amount of bio- <br /> mass evident in the groundwater immediately after its extraction This was particularly apparent <br /> ' during the initial months after the remediation program was initiated This occurrence provides <br /> evidence that the physical and chemical characteristics for bio-degradation in the groundwater <br /> both above and below the surface, are particularly favorable ATC believes the migration of <br /> ' fresh oxygenated air and water through the site as a result of the soil vapor and groundwater <br /> extraction has effected the removal of far greater amounts of hydrocarbons, by the process of <br /> enhanced bio-degradation, than have been recovered above ground in the respective SVE and <br /> ' groundwater carbon treatment units <br /> ' SVE Radius of Influence Testin <br /> During the December 10, 1998 monitoring event,a soil vapor extraction radius of influence test <br /> ' was conducted to determine the vacuum influence surrounding the co-extraction well EW-1 As <br /> soil vapor was extracted from EW-1, the vacuum influence away from the well was measured <br /> at three surrounding monitoring wells While pumping 100 cubic feet per minute from EW-1 <br />— ' the vacuum in the extraction well is only about 3 inches of mercury(39 inches of water) This <br /> attests to the relatively high degree of gas permeability in the soil surrounding the well Using <br /> supersensitive magnahelix vacuum gauges, the most notable vacuum effect was observed in <br /> monitoring well BEI-MW I located approximately 40 feet from the co-extraction well A <br /> differential of 0 3 inches of water was observed between the vacuum measured in the well and <br /> ambient air pressure The vacuum differential for BEI-MW3, located only about 10-12 feet <br /> Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation Status Report Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.