My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
260
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545483
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2020 5:10:51 PM
Creation date
3/10/2020 10:54:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545483
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005939
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA MULTIMODAL STATION
STREET_NUMBER
260
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22102024
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
260 S MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Wm. J. Hunter & Associates 2220 Loma vista Dr. <br /> Registered Geologists Sacramento, CA 95825 <br /> Petroleum& Mineral Appraisers (916) 972-7941 <br /> FAX(916) 972-1683 <br /> January 19, 1993 <br /> 1A Jim <br /> Margaret Lagoro, SR. REHS. RECEInD <br /> San Joaquin Co. Public Health Service <br /> AN <br /> Environmental Health• Division <br /> 445 No. San Joaquin Street ENV}RONANUL HtALTH <br /> Stockton, CA 95202PERMIT1 <br /> Ref: 260 So. Main St- , Manteca Site. Code 2333-1 <br /> Dear Margaret, <br /> I have' enclosed a copy of the Final lieport_ for the groundwater <br /> investigation recently conducted at 'theabove site... I believe <br /> that all of the pertinent data has been included in order to <br /> assist you in your review.` <br /> As I discussed in the report, the minor amount of Toluene <br /> detected in the soil sample. at 26'. . appears_ .to have been <br /> introduced during handling- or testing. It_ Was taken at or just <br /> slightly below the top ofttie, water. tablei and neither water <br /> sample' showed any evidence of contamination at much lower <br /> detection levels. All of. the other soil samples were also clean, <br /> supporting the evidence for-an outside source of the <br /> contamination. <br /> Therefore, it is recommended that -no further work is warranted at <br /> this location, the monitoring well be properly destroyed, and <br /> site closure be approved. <br /> Sinc y, <br /> e <br /> will , Hunter <br /> Wm, Hunter & Associates <br /> cc: Claudio Dell 'Eva <br /> Steve Martini <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.