Laserfiche WebLink
J1` NOR F 01- <br /> 1511 <br /> .. <br /> a <br /> {.� _ BLIC HEALTH SERVICES 911 <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> JOGI KHANNA M.O.,hil'.H. <br /> �3ux 2009 (1601 L•axc 1-lazelum Avenue) :+nstkaon,Califsrrnia 953U1 <br /> (309)468.3400 <br /> November 7, 1983 ( <br /> A.naela M. Gasazza <br /> C/o Claudio Dell'Eva <br /> 530 Yale street <br /> San Francisco, CA 44134 <br /> RE: Modesto Dry Ice, Inc. , 2n'J S. Main; Manteca, CA 95336. <br /> The Envilronmental Health Division has reviewed the Site Assessment Report <br /> submitted by Jim Thorpe Oil. We do not agree with the conclusions made by <br /> alis contractinn firm for the following reasons: <br /> 1. Plans which contain engineering, geology, and/or geophysical <br /> interpretations must be prepared under the direction of properly <br /> licE .sed individuals in the State of California (Refer to the <br /> 5.1 <br /> enclosed Sections 5735,7835, and 783he California Business and <br /> Professions Code). Responsibility for the technical information <br /> is indicated by the signature and/or stamp of the seal of the <br /> licensed individual. More than one signature and/or seal may be <br /> raauired where more tlian are professional specialty is included in <br /> .,Io technical doa.:uniunt submitted. <br /> Excavation procedures and suit/groundwater samplings that involve <br /> interpretation of collected data shoo d be ctifiedyoa <br /> i.Qgistered Geologist, Certified i�ngiraeerinyGeologist, <br /> Registered Engineer. <br /> 3. Site maps should illustrate the distribution (both lateral and <br /> vertical) of the contaminants in the soil and groundwnt•e.r. <br /> ,t. The reference used for reported ;7rounclaatul depth has net been <br /> included within the report. <br /> 5. The site stratigraphy has not been prfisented within the report. <br /> Although an immediate source removal has taken place and residual <br /> 5. Ath contamination appears to be absent, we cannot agree with the <br /> soilconclusion that further site evaluation is not necessary. <br /> 7. Groundwater depths in this area of San Joaquin County have been <br /> measured-to.be....20-30-.f©et below surfaco. Initial re excavation <br /> soil analysis results showed contamination present- 10 feet' be olr--.-, <br /> surface. Therefore, due to the proximitY of groundwater, a <br /> groundwater investigation should be performed. <br /> c A Divii'vn of Sin Jumquin C;nuntp 14-11"Carr Sc." t <br />