Laserfiche WebLink
- <br /> P,� <br /> lr <br /> ti I <br /> closest to 2b0 S. Main, MW--10 & MW-14, showed concentrations of <br /> BTX&E and TPH-S below detection limits, (refer to E>:hibit I) Sail <br /> vapor tests in the same area, (Exhibitn J & K) indicated a zero <br /> line north of the subject property- Soil analyses during the <br /> drilling of the bore holted com©onentsi <br /> ng wells showed no detectable <br /> concentrations of tested components in monitoring wells 09 thru <br /> #i14, (Exhibit L . ) Possible contamination from the jet fuel line <br /> tracks just north of Modesto Dry <br /> which parallels the railroad <br /> negative results. <br /> Ice, was also investigated, with <br /> item 7 states the depth to groundwater in this area has been <br /> as been <br /> measured from <br /> mani0ctinZ0weils )feet bandw that the sanalysis(Of�soil ch hsamples <br /> verified by r g ' <br /> be <br /> taken during the first re-ey:cavation indicaategroundwa er, <br /> contaminated. "Therefore, due to the proximity <br /> of groundwater investigation should be performed. " <br /> First of all, the Fast soil sample taken an Sept. 18, Igec9 <br /> tested r_lean, indicating that all residual contamination has been <br /> removed. Item 6 of the SJCFFkS l�mmediate sourcetter of beremoval has <br /> referenced earlier, states -". .an ears to be <br /> taken place: and residual soil contamination appears <br /> absent. . ." <br /> 29 Moffat <br /> As shown on Plate IX, and supported bdnientrk diseat <br /> ina7northerly <br /> Blvd. , (Exhibit H,) the groundwater gra site #2:533-1T�a7 ,�-1 would be <br /> direction. Any contamination present at <br /> detected in the monitoring wells to the north, downgradient From <br /> Modesto Dry Ice. The last known usage of the removed 2,060 UST <br /> was 5 or 6 years ago. The soils in this <br /> sFdarhaveea avelapsed very gfor <br /> permeabil-.ty, and sufficient time <br /> vertical migration of any contaminants to reach groundwater. if <br /> the groundwater had been impacted, those contaminants should have <br /> been detected in the soil samples and monitoring wells at the <br /> Manteca Dean/Golden <br /> Grain site i either inmsailmediatoryto hNorth. <br /> reccentwatersamples <br /> contamination Geto site #2333-1. It would <br /> from the monitoring wells nearest program associated with the <br /> appear that the extensive monitoring investigated the quality of <br /> project at 229 Moffat has adequately <br /> the groundwater in this area. <br /> - There are 5 municipal wells located within 112 mile of this site, <br /> (plate VII, ) and according to the Manteca City Water Department, <br /> ion to <br /> all wells are open to aquifars below 140 feet there are d3tothers <br /> the 14 monitoring wells discussed p�orioiu5o{' Yosemite Ave. As <br /> located adjacent to Main Street, s it does not appear <br /> stated in the SAF. for the Manteca Bean ntiel -future itan sitethreat to the <br /> that there is any current or Ro <br /> _quality of _the_ groundwater in this area. <br /> ._ S <br />