Laserfiche WebLink
s <br /> "g <br /> 1 <br /> w�1. <br /> }Sir <br /> PUBLICH' EALTH SERVICES <br /> SAN JQAQUIN COUNTY i)i; <br /> JOGI KN,ti[dNA NIL,,Heaf1h 0ilirrrE?0.'�i��2009 . (1601 Laxi 1•iazritanCaiifurni�.JS.UI <br /> f , ' �rdi <br /> (209)•6.9.3•i0n <br /> November 7, 198g <br /> f� <br /> il'7e13 H. <br /> c/o Claudio DeII"Eva <br /> 530 Yale Street <br /> San Frrancisco, CA 94134 <br /> y RE: Modesto Dry Ice, Inc„ 260 S. Main; Manteca, CA 95336 <br /> The Environmental Health Division has reviewed the Site Assessnent Report <br /> submitted by .aim Thorpe oil. we do not agre9 with the conclusions made by <br /> this contracting firm for the following reasons: <br /> € 1• plans which contain en-1tneering, . eology, and/or geophysical <br /> interpretations :nust be prepared t,ndEr the direction of properly <br /> licensed individuals in the State of California (Refor,to .ti:e <br /> enclosed Sections 6735,7835, and 7035.1 of California Business and <br /> Professions Code). Responsibility for the Technical information <br /> b . is indicated by .the signature and/or stamp of the seal of the <br /> l €cErrsed individual_ More than one signature and/or seal .may be <br /> required where more than one professional specialty is included in <br /> i the# tr,hniciil .docuniQnt submitted.2. 3 i <br /> Excavation procedures and sol <br /> ' 1/groundwater samplings that involve <br /> y interoretation of cullected data should be certified by a <br /> ` * registered Geologist, Certified E:ngirreering Geologist, or <br /> Renistered Engineer. <br /> 3. ''Site maps should illustrate the distribution (both lateral and <br /> vertical) of the contaminants In the soil and groundwater. <br /> d. The reference used for reported 9round4ater• depth has not been <br /> Included within the report. <br /> S. The site st.ratinraphy has not been presented wittrin the report.- -- <br /> " j 6. Although an immediate si)urce removal has taken place and residual - --- - `-- l - <br /> soil canttamination appegrs..,to.be absent, we cannot agree ui <br /> -__ - t#i .the <br /> conclusion ti;3 further site evaluation is not necessary; <br /> Y <br /> �1 .7: Groundwater depths in this area.of San Joaquin County have beenmeasured to be20-3p feet below.'sur.face.. .dnitial re•-excavation <br /> 3019 analy3is results showed contamination <br /> surface. Therefore, due to the proximity of rgroundwateesent jo eetabelow <br /> i <br /> groundwater investigation should be €}er•farmted. <br /> Joaquin LaiUnly lir�llh Curr.ti�n•i:cr,V <br /> R11101 ISHII;=1; 1 <br /> r <br />