Laserfiche WebLink
erZ:., c� �s etd - h' 0y •l': <br /> . y <br /> 4 <br /> �8� feet deep, with casing seals below 10U feet. There are a <br /> (Beacon Oil <br /> wells located at 470 No. Main Street, active <br /> monitoring adaacent to the currently <br /> Ca. ,) and 14 located on (2n'9 Moffat Dlvdi <br /> refer to Plate V111 <br /> project at Manteca Dean, the location of thane no <br /> for <br /> larger scale map indicating office, there <br /> far a lam Engineering <br /> According to the Manteca City g a{ this 5itr - <br /> k.nawn domestic wells in the vicinityItL04 <br /> by the <br /> DEPTH TO Gi�CUNDWATER: According to the latest rnap i <br /> Dan Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Consnrvatio1909`^ inithe <br /> IX} the depth to groundwater in the Fall ❑f y? feet below <br /> (Plate site was about 15' MDL, car about mLa�uraments <br /> vicinity of this supported by water level <br /> ground level. This is Supp saeils assaCxated with <br /> March of 19r30 in the monitoring (refer to Plate X) <br /> . taken in groundwater inve.atiaation; <br /> the Manteca Bean g <br /> .. refer L•a F'1 zte 1 i I for locations of <br /> LOCATION OF REMOVED TANKS; r gallon fuel tan4;s that were re,Aoved <br /> bath the 5-10 gallon and <br /> 2,000 from this property• used for storage of <br /> gallon tank had been was noted when <br /> TANK USAGE: The 550 g No evidence oresuItsleaking <br /> Of soil samples <br /> regular leaded gasoline. laboratory <br /> that tank was pulled, and EDD, TEPH-G, and organic <br /> GrJB allan tank had been used for <br /> showed non-deto Table 1. ) The fp, STggall <br /> lead; (refer to to the trustee far the estate, <br /> staring diesel fuel, but according <br /> Available records indicate <br /> rs- <br /> had not been used for <br /> rthe timeer 5 itwas pulled. <br /> the tank was emp Y arts, there <br /> ESTIMATED Ai'iGUNT OF LEAKAGE: <br /> � As stated in previous rep <br /> or possible leakage from this tank. <br /> are no records of fuel usage small amount of contamination found <br /> However, based upon the very subsequent re-excavation, <br /> when the tank was removed, and during <br /> the total amount must have been quite small . <br /> SUMMARY OF WORK PERFORMED TO DATE: 000 g <br /> 19gQ _ Thorpe Oil Co- remo'�ed a'' empkb `San Joaquin <br /> u November 9, As required Y <br /> two sidewall ("') sail samples were taken from <br /> LEST which had contained diesel fee ground surface. The <br /> Co. regulations, area, lo' below gr <br /> each end of the excavated transferred under Chain of Custody, <br /> samples were collected and TPH-D, end organic lean by <br /> and anaiyz <br /> ed for BTX&E, EDB, to the hole, and the void <br /> laboratories. The spaii was returned <br /> occupied by the tank was filled with clean dirt. <br /> cram Canonie Labs showed <br /> -- - Wvember L`'', <br /> 1988 - Laboratory report was <br /> - -_ -- - - east-ea of the excavation, 1~Ea.,t, <br /> the Sample taker' limiltshfar all constituents tdstad except - <br /> TVP <br /> below detection <br />