My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004544
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
334
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545484
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004544
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2020 12:00:16 AM
Creation date
3/10/2020 11:23:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0004544
RECORD_ID
PR0545484
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003714
FACILITY_NAME
LACHHAR CHEVRON*
STREET_NUMBER
334
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
26115041
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
334 E MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
05
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I 1 <br /> li 4 <br /> detector (PID) with a 10 2 eV lamp The test procedure involved measuring approximately <br /> 30 grams from an undisturbed soil sample, placing this subsample in a clean glass lar, and <br /> sealing the lar with aluminum foil secured under a ring-type threaded lid The lar was warmed <br /> for approximately 20 minutes (in the sun), the foil pierced, and the head-space within the lar <br /> tested for total organic vapor, measured in parts per million as benzene (ppm, <br /> volume/volume) The instrument was calibrated prior to drilling using a 100-ppm isobutylene <br /> standard (in air) and a sensitivity factor of 55 which relates the photo-ionization potential of <br /> benzene to that of isobutylene at 100 ppm The results of the field testing are noted on the <br /> boring logs PID readings are useful for indicating relative levels of contamination, but cannot <br /> be used to evaluate hydrocarbon levels with the confidence of laboratory analyses <br /> Well Development and Groundwater Sampling <br /> The new monitoring wells were developed by surging the screened interval with a surge block <br /> and purging ten casing volumes of water from the well Well development purgewater was <br /> stored and disposed with the steamcleaner rinsate generated during drilling <br /> Rinsate, Purge, Development Waters, and Soil Cuttings Storage and <br /> Disposal <br /> . Waters produced during field activities were transported via a purge trailer and disposed of at <br /> a state-certified treatment and disposal facility Steam cleaning ansate water from drilling was <br /> temporarily stored on site in DOT-approved 55-gallon drums pending transport and disposal <br /> Soil cuttings generated during drilling were placed on visqueen and covered with plastic <br /> Samples of the cuttings were collected and sent to a state-certified laboratory for analysis <br /> Pending analytical results, the soil cuttings will be hauled by a state-certified waste hauler to a <br /> state-certified treatment and disposal facility <br /> Laboratory Procedures <br /> Selected soil samples and groundwater samples were analyzed by a California State-certified <br /> laboratory for the presence of total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons calculated as gasoline <br /> (TPPH-g), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX compounds) and MTBE using <br /> modified EPA Methods 8015 and 8020 In addition, selected soil and groundwater samples <br /> were analyzed for the presence of total extractable petroleum hydrocarbons calculated as <br /> diesel (TEPH-d)using modified EPA Method 8015 <br /> 3201591A/REPORT A-2 May 6, 1996 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.