My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MANTHEY
>
2224
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545512
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2020 5:10:41 AM
Creation date
3/10/2020 1:37:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545512
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0003679
FACILITY_NAME
CALIFORNIA STOP*
STREET_NUMBER
2224
STREET_NAME
MANTHEY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16313007
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2224 MANTHEY RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-w'.BLE 1 -CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DATA — <br /> FOR NO FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND TANK SITES <br /> Site Name and Location: California Stop, 2220(formerly 2224)Manthey Road, Stockton, San Joaquin County <br /> Y 1. Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic. Seven private water supply wells were identified within 2,000 feet <br /> agriculture, industry and other uses within 2000 feet of the site: <br /> of this Site. The closest well,about 370 feet northeast of the site, <br /> and five additional private wells are up-gradient of the Site. The <br /> Y seventh well is cross-gradient. These wells should not be <br /> threatened by the release from this Site. <br /> 2. Site maps, to scale, of area impacted showing locations of former Site maps were provided in reports showing location of <br /> tanks, monitoring wells and structures on-site. <br /> and existing tank systems, excavation contours and sample locations, <br /> Y borings and monitoring wells elevation contours, gradients, and nearby <br /> surface waters, buildings, streets, and subsurface utilities; <br /> 3. Figures depicting lithology(cross Cross-sections depicting lithology were provided in the 2010 Corrective Action Plan. <br /> Y section), treatment system diagrams, <br /> 4. Stockpiled sot!remaining on-site or San Joaquin County will require all investigative derived waste be removed from the <br /> Y site before closure of this case. <br /> off-site disposal(quantity): <br /> 5. Mite dip wells remainingon-Site, fate; San Joaquin County will require all wells be destroyed before closure of this case. <br /> Y 5. Tabulated results of all groundwater Tabulated results of groundwater elevation data is provided in groundwater monitoring <br /> reports. <br /> elevations and depths to water <br /> Y 7. Tabulated results of all sampling and analyses: Tabulated results cf groundwater data were provided in reports. One soil <br /> sample collected from a depth of 27 ft.bgs was analyzed for lead content and <br /> MDetection limits for confirmation sampling the result was 32 mg/kg. This values is believed to represent naturally <br /> Eloccurring lead in soils in this area. <br /> Lead analyses <br /> Y 8. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in soil <br /> Soil and groundwater concentration contours <br /> Feqgroundwater, and both on-site and off-site: depicting lateral and vertical delineation are <br /> Lateral and Y Vertical extent of soil contamination included in the 2010 CAP. <br /> Lateral and BVertical extent of groundwater contamination <br /> N 9. Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface March an eight hour SVE pilot rest was <br /> conducted <br /> and the calculated radius of influence in <br /> remediation system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and shallow soil was 75 feet. <br /> groundwater remediation system; <br /> Y 10.Reports/information ❑Y Unauthorized Release Form M QMRs <br /> ❑Y Well and boring logs ❑N PAR ❑N FRP ❑Y Other Corrective Action Plan <br /> Y 11.Best Available Technology(BAT) used or an In June 2013,a six-month ozone pilot test was initiated. San Joaquin Co.received <br /> explanation for not using BAT; notification from the St. Bd. CUF that the case should be closed and the pilot test <br /> was terminated in October 2013. <br /> Y 12.Reasons whybackground walls unattainable San Joaquin Co.received notification from the St. Bd. CUF that the case should <br /> g be closed and the pilot test was terminated in October 2013. <br /> usin BAT: <br /> Y 13.Mass balance calculation of substance Calculated residual petroleum in soil about 6,147 lbs. (-1,000 gallons)and about <br /> 524 lbs. (-84 gallons)in groundwater. About 1.2 lbs. of petroleum was removed <br /> treated versus that remaining, during an eight hour SVE test. <br /> The exient of petroieum impacts are adequarely defined by <br /> 71 14.Assumptions. parameters, calculations and model used grab groundwater samples collected across Manthey Road to <br /> in risk assessments, and fate and transport modeling, the west of the site. <br /> .Rationale why conditions remaining at site will not Groundwater impacts are stable to decreasing in concentration in <br /> 15 <br /> Y monitoring wells on-site. No sensitive receptors appear to be <br /> adversely impact water quality, health, or other beneficial threatened and under current land use residual pollution will not <br /> uses,-and adversely impact human health or the environment. <br /> N No WET or TCLP analyses were requested. <br /> 16.WET or TCLP results <br /> By: Comments: The site is an active service station bounded to the east by Interstate Hwy. 5 and a large open field to <br /> the west. Residential homes are south of the site and a commercial property currently exists to the north. Although <br /> multiple water supply wells were identified within 2,000 feet of this site,the majority of the wells are up-gradient of the <br /> cic site and one well is located cross-gradient. This site does not meet the Low Threat Closure Policy criteria because <br /> MtBE concentrations in one on-site well are greater than 1,000 ug/L and a private well is located 370 feet away. In <br /> Date: June 2013, a six-month ozone pilot test was initiated. San Joaquin Co. received notification from the St. Bd. CUF that <br /> 10/28/2014 the case should be closed and the pilot test was terminated in October 2013. In general, pollutant concentrations are <br /> stable to decreasing and appear to be limited to the station property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.