My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
510
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545486
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2020 5:13:06 PM
Creation date
3/10/2020 2:48:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0545486
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005611
FACILITY_NAME
ROYAL OAKS SAVINGS
STREET_NUMBER
510
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
510 N MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6. Mass balance calculation of the substance treated versus that <br /> remaining, <br /> 7. Technology used to clean the site; if Best Available Technology <br /> (FIAT) was not used, explain why, <br /> 8. Zone of influence calculated for the subsurface remediation system <br /> and the zone of capture attained for the soil and ground water <br /> remediation system, <br /> 9. Reasons why "background" was/is unattainable using BAT, and <br /> 10. Rationale why conditions remaining at the site will not adversely == <br /> impact water- duality; health, or other bene.tica? uses. <br /> Additional information submitted, such as risk assessments or fate and transport <br /> modeling, must include the assumptions used. <br /> Where it has been decided that only soil has been impacted, evidence substantiating <br /> the condition must be submitted. <br /> Concurrence with the site conditions will include the following: <br /> "Based on the information provided, Board staff has determined [and <br /> the Local Implementing Agency concurs,]that appropriate response <br /> actions have been completed, that acceptable remedial practices were <br /> implemented, and that, at this time, no further investigation, remedial <br /> or removal action, or monitoring is required at [Facility name and <br /> address]. <br /> Nothing in this.determination shall constitute or be construed as a <br /> satisfaction or release from liability for any conditions or claims arising <br /> as a result of past, current, or future operations at this location. <br /> Nothing in this determination is intended or shall be construed to <br /> limit -:he rights of any parties with respect to claims arising out of or <br /> relating to deposit or disposal at any other location of substances <br /> removed from the site., Nothing in this determination is intended or <br /> shall be construed to limit or preclude the Board or any other agency <br /> from taking any further enforcement actions. <br /> This letter does not relieve the tank owner of any responsibilities <br /> mandated under the California Health and Safety Code and California <br /> Water Code if existing, additional, or previously unidentified <br /> contamination at the site causes or threatens to cause pollution or <br /> nuisance or is found to pose a threat to public health or water quality. <br /> Changes in the present land use may require further assessment and <br /> mitigation." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.