Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> Royal Oak Savings & Loan Page 4 <br /> SION. Main Street, Manteca, California <br /> Quarterly Ground Water Sampling Report <br /> October, 1992 -January, 1993 <br /> Ground Water Grads'ent <br />' Ground water level measurements were carred out monthly during the quarter on October <br /> 24, November 24, and December 28, 1992, as well as durmg the the sampling event our <br />' January 27, 1993 The vapor exrractaon system installed on MW-2 prevented level <br /> measurements from this well during November and December The ground water <br /> elevation measurements are tabulated in Table 1 and gradients for the respective months <br />' are contoured on Figures 2, 3, 4 and 5 <br /> The ground water elevations in the monitoring wells on the Royal Oak site were virtually <br />' unchanged for the months of August through December, 1992 (Figures 2-4) Water <br /> measurements taken during the monitoring event on January 27, 1993, show*hat, not only <br /> did the water levels all of the wells rise, but also the gradient had reversed with the % <br />' table contours forming a southeastzrly-trCZIding trough(Figure 5) <br /> The ground water contours for this period form a westerly-trending trough, wvhenit <br />' reversed from an easterly-finding trough. hicoinplete infarmaUM suggests that the <br /> westerly-trending trough in the piezometric surface prevails in the late sumo= and <br /> through most of the winter months The pattern thea changes to an easterly-Wmdnng <br /> trough under the influence of recharge of the aquifer from winter rainfall <br /> Summary ofAnalyh'rcal Findings <br /> Monitoring wells 7 and 8 were sampled on November 4, 1992, and tested 'none detected" for all <br /> analytes Well 2 was not tested at that time as a soil vapor extractign system was installed on <br /> MW-2, and access was tempoianly restricted However, all three wells were sampled on �anuary <br /> 27, 1993, and were N D for,all analytes tested(see Table 2) <br /> I is worth noting that air samples tested from the soil vapor system at the start up showed T H <br /> moons of greater than 2,500 ppm The levels have declined rapidly and, as of December <br /> 25, 1992,the levels are "none detected" We have enclosed a summary of the air testing performed <br /> at the site since the soil vapor system was turned on(Table 4) <br /> tRecommendadons <br /> Wf IF recommends that the soil vapor extraction system be removed fi ani the site We also <br /> recommend that the site be considered for closure The San Joaquin County Envmmmental Health <br /> Department has condended that the contaminated soils left in place at the comer was the <br /> cause of the intermittent ground water contamination in wells 2 and 7 The soils are now <br /> clean, via the soil vapor adraction system, and ground water samples indicate that the <br /> ground water is no longer contaminated <br />